MTYY vs. AMDW

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

MTYY (GraniteShares YieldBoost MSTR ETF) and AMDW (Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. Their 0.35 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. MTYY charges 1.07%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for AMDW.

Performance

MTYY vs. AMDW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares YieldBoost MSTR ETF (MTYY) and Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF (AMDW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MTYY achieves a -33.95% return, which is significantly lower than AMDW's 146.74% return.

MTYY

• 1D: -0.15%
• 1M: -2.29%
• 6M: -32.44%
• YTD: -33.95%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

AMDW

• 1D: -2.02%
• 1M: -10.13%
• 6M: 119.90%
• YTD: 146.74%
• 1Y: 209.29%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 229.60%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
AMDW Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF	$10.26M	$9.58M	$8.51M
MTYY GraniteShares YieldBoost MSTR ETF	$48.29K	$43.25K	$78.51K

MTYY vs. AMDW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
MTYY GraniteShares YieldBoost MSTR ETF	-33.95%	-55.60%
AMDW Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF	146.74%	37.73%

Correlation

The correlation between MTYY and AMDW is 0.35, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 23, 2025	0.35

Return for Risk

MTYY vs. AMDW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

MTYY

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

AMDW

AMDW Risk / Return Rank: 88
AMDW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 92
AMDW Sortino Ratio Rank: 87
AMDW Omega Ratio Rank: 84
AMDW Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
AMDW Martin Ratio Rank: 84

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

MTYY vs. AMDW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares YieldBoost MSTR ETF (MTYY) and Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF (AMDW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MTYY	AMDW	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	2.36	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.92	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.36	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	5.83	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	11.47	—

Drawdowns

MTYY vs. AMDW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MTYY drawdown since its inception was -70.83%, which is greater than AMDW's maximum drawdown of -34.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MTYY and AMDW.

Drawdown Indicators

	MTYY	AMDW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-70.83%	-34.64%	-36.19%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-34.64%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-70.68%	-21.39%	-49.29%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-53.50%	-13.97%	-39.53%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	17.59%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	MTYY	AMDW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	28.87%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	67.40%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	32.35%	85.70%	-53.35%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	32.35%	85.05%	-52.70%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	32.35%	85.05%	-52.70%

MTYY vs. AMDW - Expense Ratio Comparison

MTYY has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than AMDW's 0.99% expense ratio.

Dividends

MTYY vs. AMDW - Dividend Comparison

MTYY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 243.94%, more than AMDW's 53.42% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
AMDW Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF	53.42%	34.78%
MTYY GraniteShares YieldBoost MSTR ETF	243.94%	48.98%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MTYY and AMDW in my portfolio?

MTYY and AMDW have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, MTYY or AMDW?

On fees, AMDW is cheaper at 0.99% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, MTYY or AMDW?

AMDW is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for MTYY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MTYY or AMDW?

MTYY has the higher dividend yield at 243.94%, compared with 53.42% for AMDW.

What is the main difference between MTYY and AMDW?

They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for MTYY and 0.99% for AMDW.