MSFX vs. FDL

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

MSFX (T-Rex 2X Long Microsoft Daily Target ETF) and FDL (First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - MSFX is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by T-Rex, while FDL is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index. MSFX is actively managed, while FDL is passively managed. Over the past year, MSFX returned -23.62% vs 24.43% for FDL. At a 0.02 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MSFX charges 1.05%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for FDL.

Performance

MSFX vs. FDL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T-Rex 2X Long Microsoft Daily Target ETF (MSFX) and First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund (FDL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MSFX achieves a -23.22% return, which is significantly lower than FDL's 13.62% return.

MSFX

• 1D: -8.16%
• 1M: 12.12%
• YTD: -23.22%
• 6M: -27.81%
• 1Y: -23.62%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FDL

• 1D: 0.42%
• 1M: -0.81%
• YTD: 13.62%
• 6M: 16.42%
• 1Y: 24.43%
• 3Y*: 19.07%
• 5Y*: 12.64%
• 10Y*: 11.27%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MSFX vs. FDL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
MSFX T-Rex 2X Long Microsoft Daily Target ETF	-23.22%	9.84%	3.81%
FDL First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund	13.62%	14.79%	17.92%

Correlation

The correlation between MSFX and FDL is -0.14, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.14
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 12, 2024	0.02

The correlation between MSFX and FDL shifts across timeframes, from -0.14 (1 year) to 0.02 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

MSFX vs. FDL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MSFX

MSFX Risk / Return Rank: 5
MSFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5
MSFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5
MSFX Omega Ratio Rank: 5
MSFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5
MSFX Martin Ratio Rank: 5

FDL

FDL Risk / Return Rank: 73
FDL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 65
FDL Sortino Ratio Rank: 73
FDL Omega Ratio Rank: 62
FDL Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
FDL Martin Ratio Rank: 73

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MSFX vs. FDL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-Rex 2X Long Microsoft Daily Target ETF (MSFX) and First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund (FDL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MSFX	FDL	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.47	2.18	-2.65
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-0.38	3.35	-3.72
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.95	1.38	-0.43
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.38	5.74	-6.12
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-0.73	14.05	-14.78
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MSFX vs. FDL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MSFX Sharpe Ratio is -0.47, which is lower than the FDL Sharpe Ratio of 2.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MSFX and FDL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MSFX	FDL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.47	2.18	-2.65
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.89	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.66	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.11	0.45	-0.56

Drawdowns

MSFX vs. FDL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MSFX drawdown since its inception was -60.86%, smaller than the maximum FDL drawdown of -65.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSFX and FDL.

Drawdown Indicators

	MSFX	FDL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-60.86%	-65.93%	+5.07%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-60.86%	-4.27%	-56.59%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-12.24%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-16.46%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-41.40%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-41.88%	-1.92%	-39.96%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-21.20%	-9.66%	-11.54%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	31.67%	1.75%	+29.92%

Volatility

MSFX vs. FDL - Volatility Comparison

T-Rex 2X Long Microsoft Daily Target ETF (MSFX) has a higher volatility of 18.10% compared to First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund (FDL) at 2.95%. This indicates that MSFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FDL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MSFX	FDL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	18.10%	2.95%	+15.15%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	44.83%	7.87%	+36.96%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	49.96%	11.27%	+38.69%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	49.18%	14.31%	+34.87%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	49.18%	17.11%	+32.07%

MSFX vs. FDL - Expense Ratio Comparison

MSFX has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is higher than FDL's 0.45% expense ratio.

Dividends

MSFX vs. FDL - Dividend Comparison

MSFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.96%, more than FDL's 3.67% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FDL First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund	3.67%	4.04%	4.96%	4.58%	3.58%	4.59%	4.48%	3.75%	3.97%	3.18%	2.93%	3.65%
MSFX T-Rex 2X Long Microsoft Daily Target ETF	6.96%	5.34%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MSFX and FDL in my portfolio?

MSFX and FDL have a correlation of -0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MSFX or FDL?

MSFX has higher volatility (18.10%) compared to FDL (2.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MSFX dropped -60.86% vs FDL's -65.93%.

Which ETF is better, MSFX or FDL?

On 1-year performance, FDL leads with 24.43% vs -23.62% for MSFX. On fees, FDL is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, FDL has been the lower-risk option at 2.95%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, MSFX or FDL?

Over the 1-year period, FDL has performed better with a 24.43% return vs -23.62%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, MSFX or FDL?

FDL is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for MSFX.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MSFX or FDL?

MSFX has the higher dividend yield at 6.96%, compared with 3.67% for FDL.

What is the main difference between MSFX and FDL?

MSFX is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while FDL is Large Cap Value Equities. They also come from different issuers: T-Rex and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 1.05% for MSFX and 0.45% for FDL.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FDL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.18 vs -0.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.