MSFX vs. NVDA
MSFX (T-Rex 2X Long Microsoft Daily Target ETF) is Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by T-Rex, while NVDA (NVIDIA Corporation) is a stock. Over the past year, MSFX returned -29.20% vs 52.10% for NVDA. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
MSFX vs. NVDA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MSFX achieves a -28.34% return, which is significantly lower than NVDA's 15.15% return.
MSFX
- 1D
- -6.67%
- 1M
- 5.21%
- YTD
- -28.34%
- 6M
- -29.12%
- 1Y
- -29.20%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NVDA
- 1D
- -3.62%
- 1M
- 8.20%
- YTD
- 15.15%
- 6M
- 19.59%
- 1Y
- 52.10%
- 3Y*
- 76.15%
- 5Y*
- 65.05%
- 10Y*
- 68.84%
MSFX vs. NVDA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
MSFX T-Rex 2X Long Microsoft Daily Target ETF | -28.34% | 9.84% | 3.81% |
NVDA NVIDIA Corporation | 15.15% | 38.92% | 145.03% |
Correlation
The correlation between MSFX and NVDA is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 12, 2024 | 0.49 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MSFX vs. NVDA — Risk / Return Rank
MSFX
NVDA
MSFX vs. NVDA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-Rex 2X Long Microsoft Daily Target ETF (MSFX) and NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MSFX | NVDA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.12 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.71 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.93 | 1.26 | -0.33 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.48 | 2.59 | -3.07 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.92 | 6.36 | -7.28 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MSFX | NVDA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.58 | 1.53 | -2.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 1.27 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 1.39 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.17 | 0.63 | -0.79 |
Drawdowns
MSFX vs. NVDA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MSFX drawdown since its inception was -60.86%, smaller than the maximum NVDA drawdown of -89.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSFX and NVDA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MSFX | NVDA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.86% | -89.72% | +28.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -60.86% | -20.21% | -40.65% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -36.88% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -66.34% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -66.34% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -45.75% | -8.90% | -36.85% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.24% | -36.21% | +14.97% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 31.80% | 8.21% | +23.59% |
Volatility
MSFX vs. NVDA - Volatility Comparison
T-Rex 2X Long Microsoft Daily Target ETF (MSFX) has a higher volatility of 19.56% compared to NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) at 12.53%. This indicates that MSFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NVDA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MSFX | NVDA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 19.56% | 12.53% | +7.03% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 45.26% | 25.54% | +19.72% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 50.40% | 34.22% | +16.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 49.33% | 51.69% | -2.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 49.33% | 49.80% | -0.47% |
Dividends
MSFX vs. NVDA - Dividend Comparison
MSFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.45%, more than NVDA's 0.02% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MSFX T-Rex 2X Long Microsoft Daily Target ETF | 7.45% | 5.34% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
NVDA NVIDIA Corporation | 0.02% | 0.02% | 0.03% | 0.03% | 0.11% | 0.05% | 0.12% | 0.27% | 0.46% | 0.29% | 0.45% | 1.20% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MSFX and NVDA have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MSFX has higher volatility (19.56%) compared to NVDA (12.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MSFX dropped -60.86% vs NVDA's -89.72%.
NVDA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.53 vs -0.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MSFX and NVDA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer