MSFX vs. MSFL

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about T-Rex 2X Long Microsoft Daily Target ETF (MSFX) and GraniteShares 2x Long MSFT Daily ETF (MSFL).

MSFX and MSFL are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. MSFX is an actively managed fund by T-Rex. It was launched on Jan 10, 2024. MSFL is an actively managed fund by GraniteShares. It was launched on Mar 15, 2024.

Performance

MSFX vs. MSFL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T-Rex 2X Long Microsoft Daily Target ETF (MSFX) and GraniteShares 2x Long MSFT Daily ETF (MSFL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

MSFX vs. MSFL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
MSFX T-Rex 2X Long Microsoft Daily Target ETF	-44.31%	9.84%	-9.40%
MSFL GraniteShares 2x Long MSFT Daily ETF	-43.95%	16.99%	-9.07%

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with MSFX having a -44.31% return and MSFL slightly higher at -43.95%.

MSFX

• 1D: 6.35%
• 1M: -12.12%
• YTD: -44.31%
• 6M: -54.13%
• 1Y: -19.28%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

MSFL

• 1D: 6.35%
• 1M: -12.11%
• YTD: -43.95%
• 6M: -52.20%
• 1Y: -14.43%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MSFX vs. MSFL - Expense Ratio Comparison

MSFX has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is lower than MSFL's 1.15% expense ratio.

MSFL

GraniteShares 2x Long MSFT Daily ETF

MSFX

T-Rex 2X Long Microsoft Daily Target ETF

Return for Risk

MSFX vs. MSFL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MSFX

MSFX Risk / Return Rank: 6
MSFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6
MSFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7
MSFX Omega Ratio Rank: 7
MSFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6
MSFX Martin Ratio Rank: 5

MSFL

MSFL Risk / Return Rank: 8
MSFL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7
MSFL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9
MSFL Omega Ratio Rank: 9
MSFL Calmar Ratio Rank: 8
MSFL Martin Ratio Rank: 7

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MSFX vs. MSFL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-Rex 2X Long Microsoft Daily Target ETF (MSFX) and GraniteShares 2x Long MSFT Daily ETF (MSFL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MSFX	MSFL	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.36	-0.27	-0.09
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-0.20	-0.04	-0.15
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.97	0.99	-0.02
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.34	-0.27	-0.07
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-0.86	-0.69	-0.17
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MSFX vs. MSFL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MSFX Sharpe Ratio is -0.36, which is lower than the MSFL Sharpe Ratio of -0.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MSFX and MSFL, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MSFX	MSFL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.36	-0.27	-0.09
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.39	-0.47	+0.08

Correlation

The correlation between MSFX and MSFL is 0.99, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

MSFX vs. MSFL - Dividend Comparison

MSFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.59%, while MSFL has not paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025
MSFX T-Rex 2X Long Microsoft Daily Target ETF	9.59%	5.34%
MSFL GraniteShares 2x Long MSFT Daily ETF	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

MSFX vs. MSFL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MSFX drawdown since its inception was -60.86%, roughly equal to the maximum MSFL drawdown of -59.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSFX and MSFL.

Drawdown Indicators

	MSFX	MSFL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-60.86%	-59.39%	-1.47%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-60.86%	-59.39%	-1.47%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-57.85%	-56.32%	-1.53%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-19.07%	-19.41%	+0.34%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	24.49%	23.60%	+0.89%

Volatility

MSFX vs. MSFL - Volatility Comparison

T-Rex 2X Long Microsoft Daily Target ETF (MSFX) and GraniteShares 2x Long MSFT Daily ETF (MSFL) have volatilities of 13.18% and 13.12%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MSFX	MSFL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	13.18%	13.12%	+0.06%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	39.27%	39.15%	+0.12%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	53.16%	52.83%	+0.33%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	47.79%	47.91%	-0.12%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	47.79%	47.91%	-0.12%