PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MSFX vs. MSFW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MSFX vs. MSFW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T-Rex 2X Long Microsoft Daily Target ETF (MSFX) and Roundhill MSFT WeeklyPay™ ETF (MSFW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MSFX achieves a -47.64% return, which is significantly lower than MSFW's -29.10% return.


MSFX

1D
-6.41%
1M
-24.51%
YTD
-47.64%
6M
-49.12%
1Y
-50.92%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

MSFW

1D
-3.84%
1M
-14.79%
YTD
-29.10%
6M
-29.39%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MSFX vs. MSFW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
MSFX
T-Rex 2X Long Microsoft Daily Target ETF
-47.64%-15.74%
MSFW
Roundhill MSFT WeeklyPay™ ETF
-29.10%-7.80%

Correlation

The correlation between MSFX and MSFW is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 24, 2025

0.99

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MSFX vs. MSFW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MSFX
MSFX Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
MSFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MSFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
MSFX Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
MSFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
MSFX Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank

MSFW

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MSFX vs. MSFW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-Rex 2X Long Microsoft Daily Target ETF (MSFX) and Roundhill MSFT WeeklyPay™ ETF (MSFW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MSFXMSFWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.82

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.84

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.50

MSFX vs. MSFW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MSFX vs. MSFW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MSFX drawdown since its inception was -60.86%, which is greater than MSFW's maximum drawdown of -40.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSFX and MSFW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MSFXMSFWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.86%

-40.42%

-20.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-60.86%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-60.36%

-38.69%

-21.67%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.84%

-18.18%

-3.66%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

33.88%

Volatility

MSFX vs. MSFW - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MSFXMSFWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

22.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

46.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

52.28%

32.65%

+19.63%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

49.69%

32.65%

+17.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

49.69%

32.65%

+17.04%

MSFX vs. MSFW - Expense Ratio Comparison

MSFX has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is higher than MSFW's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

MSFX vs. MSFW - Dividend Comparison

MSFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.20%, less than MSFW's 49.90% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.99, MSFX and MSFW move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, MSFW is cheaper at 0.99% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

MSFW is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for MSFX.

MSFW has the higher dividend yield at 49.90%, compared with 10.20% for MSFX.

MSFX is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while MSFW is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: T-Rex and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 1.05% for MSFX and 0.99% for MSFW.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MSFX and MSFW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer