MSFX vs. MSFW
MSFX (T-Rex 2X Long Microsoft Daily Target ETF) and MSFW (Roundhill MSFT WeeklyPay™ ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MSFX is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by T-Rex, while MSFW is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Roundhill. Both are actively managed. With a 0.99 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. MSFX charges 1.05%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for MSFW.
Performance
MSFX vs. MSFW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MSFX achieves a -47.64% return, which is significantly lower than MSFW's -29.10% return.
MSFX
- 1D
- -6.41%
- 1M
- -24.51%
- YTD
- -47.64%
- 6M
- -49.12%
- 1Y
- -50.92%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MSFW
- 1D
- -3.84%
- 1M
- -14.79%
- YTD
- -29.10%
- 6M
- -29.39%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MSFX vs. MSFW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
MSFX T-Rex 2X Long Microsoft Daily Target ETF | -47.64% | -15.74% |
MSFW Roundhill MSFT WeeklyPay™ ETF | -29.10% | -7.80% |
Correlation
The correlation between MSFX and MSFW is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 24, 2025 | 0.99 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MSFX vs. MSFW — Risk / Return Rank
MSFX
MSFW
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
MSFX vs. MSFW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-Rex 2X Long Microsoft Daily Target ETF (MSFX) and Roundhill MSFT WeeklyPay™ ETF (MSFW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MSFX | MSFW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.82 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.84 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.50 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MSFX vs. MSFW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MSFX drawdown since its inception was -60.86%, which is greater than MSFW's maximum drawdown of -40.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSFX and MSFW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MSFX | MSFW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.86% | -40.42% | -20.44% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -60.86% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -60.36% | -38.69% | -21.67% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.84% | -18.18% | -3.66% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 33.88% | — | — |
Volatility
MSFX vs. MSFW - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MSFX | MSFW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 22.23% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 46.52% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 52.28% | 32.65% | +19.63% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 49.69% | 32.65% | +17.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 49.69% | 32.65% | +17.04% |
MSFX vs. MSFW - Expense Ratio Comparison
MSFX has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is higher than MSFW's 0.99% expense ratio.
Dividends
MSFX vs. MSFW - Dividend Comparison
MSFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.20%, less than MSFW's 49.90% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
MSFW Roundhill MSFT WeeklyPay™ ETF | 49.90% | 20.25% |
MSFX T-Rex 2X Long Microsoft Daily Target ETF | 10.20% | 5.34% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.99, MSFX and MSFW move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, MSFW is cheaper at 0.99% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MSFW is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for MSFX.
MSFW has the higher dividend yield at 49.90%, compared with 10.20% for MSFX.
MSFX is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while MSFW is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: T-Rex and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 1.05% for MSFX and 0.99% for MSFW.
Find the right allocation for MSFX and MSFW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer