MSFW vs. XOMO
MSFW (Roundhill MSFT WeeklyPay™ ETF) and XOMO (YieldMax XOM Option Income Strategy ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.12, they often move in opposite directions. MSFW charges 0.99%/yr vs 1.01%/yr for XOMO.
Performance
MSFW vs. XOMO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MSFW achieves a -14.73% return, which is significantly lower than XOMO's 17.25% return.
MSFW
- 1D
- -3.61%
- 1M
- 4.05%
- YTD
- -14.73%
- 6M
- -13.76%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XOMO
- 1D
- 1.39%
- 1M
- -1.15%
- YTD
- 17.25%
- 6M
- 19.54%
- 1Y
- 30.87%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MSFW vs. XOMO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
MSFW Roundhill MSFT WeeklyPay™ ETF | -14.73% | -7.81% |
XOMO YieldMax XOM Option Income Strategy ETF | 17.25% | 7.51% |
Correlation
The correlation between MSFW and XOMO is -0.12, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 25, 2025 | -0.12 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MSFW vs. XOMO — Risk / Return Rank
MSFW
XOMO
MSFW vs. XOMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill MSFT WeeklyPay™ ETF (MSFW) and YieldMax XOM Option Income Strategy ETF (XOMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MSFW | XOMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.55 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.76 | 0.39 | -1.15 |
Drawdowns
MSFW vs. XOMO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MSFW drawdown since its inception was -40.42%, which is greater than XOMO's maximum drawdown of -18.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSFW and XOMO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MSFW | XOMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.42% | -18.90% | -21.52% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -13.73% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -26.27% | -9.89% | -16.38% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.45% | -7.21% | -10.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 4.88% | — |
Volatility
MSFW vs. XOMO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MSFW | XOMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 7.53% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 16.61% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 32.40% | 20.07% | +12.33% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.40% | 18.95% | +13.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.40% | 18.95% | +13.45% |
MSFW vs. XOMO - Expense Ratio Comparison
MSFW has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is lower than XOMO's 1.01% expense ratio.
Dividends
MSFW vs. XOMO - Dividend Comparison
MSFW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 39.31%, more than XOMO's 34.77% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
MSFW Roundhill MSFT WeeklyPay™ ETF | 39.31% | 20.25% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XOMO YieldMax XOM Option Income Strategy ETF | 34.77% | 31.64% | 26.94% | 5.13% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MSFW and XOMO have a correlation of -0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, MSFW is cheaper at 0.99% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MSFW is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for XOMO.
MSFW has the higher dividend yield at 39.31%, compared with 34.77% for XOMO.
They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and YieldMax. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for MSFW and 1.01% for XOMO.
Find the right allocation for MSFW and XOMO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer