MSFW vs. MSFU

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

MSFW (Roundhill MSFT WeeklyPay™ ETF) and MSFU (Direxion Daily MSFT Bull 2X Shares) are both exchange-traded funds - MSFW is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Roundhill, while MSFU is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Microsoft Corporation (150%). MSFW is actively managed, while MSFU is passively managed. With a 0.99 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. MSFW charges 0.99%/yr vs 1.04%/yr for MSFU.

Performance

MSFW vs. MSFU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill MSFT WeeklyPay™ ETF (MSFW) and Direxion Daily MSFT Bull 2X Shares (MSFU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MSFW achieves a -27.29% return, which is significantly higher than MSFU's -45.68% return.

MSFW

• 1D: 2.55%
• 1M: -12.61%
• YTD: -27.29%
• 6M: -27.90%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

MSFU

• 1D: 2.99%
• 1M: -22.25%
• YTD: -45.68%
• 6M: -46.49%
• 1Y: -49.63%
• 3Y*: -9.21%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MSFW vs. MSFU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
MSFW Roundhill MSFT WeeklyPay™ ETF	-27.29%	-7.80%
MSFU Direxion Daily MSFT Bull 2X Shares	-45.68%	-13.90%

Correlation

The correlation between MSFW and MSFU is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 24, 2025	0.99

MSFW vs. MSFU - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	MSFW	MSFU
Technology	35.1%	100.0%
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

MSFW vs. MSFU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MSFW

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

MSFU

MSFU Risk / Return Rank: 2
MSFU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1
MSFU Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
MSFU Omega Ratio Rank: 1
MSFU Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
MSFU Martin Ratio Rank: 1

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MSFW vs. MSFU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill MSFT WeeklyPay™ ETF (MSFW) and Direxion Daily MSFT Bull 2X Shares (MSFU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MSFW	MSFU	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	-0.96	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	-1.36	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	0.83	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	-0.83	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	-1.50	—

Drawdowns

MSFW vs. MSFU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MSFW drawdown since its inception was -40.42%, smaller than the maximum MSFU drawdown of -59.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSFW and MSFU.

Drawdown Indicators

	MSFW	MSFU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-40.42%	-59.83%	+19.41%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-59.83%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-59.83%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-37.13%	-57.95%	+20.82%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-18.26%	-16.98%	-1.28%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	33.19%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	MSFW	MSFU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	22.49%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	46.49%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	32.71%	51.94%	-19.23%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	32.71%	46.60%	-13.89%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	32.71%	46.60%	-13.89%

MSFW vs. MSFU - Expense Ratio Comparison

MSFW has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is lower than MSFU's 1.04% expense ratio.

Dividends

MSFW vs. MSFU - Dividend Comparison

MSFW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 48.66%, more than MSFU's 14.56% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
MSFU Direxion Daily MSFT Bull 2X Shares	14.56%	8.15%	7.00%	2.11%	0.54%
MSFW Roundhill MSFT WeeklyPay™ ETF	48.66%	20.25%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MSFW and MSFU in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.99, MSFW and MSFU move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which ETF is better, MSFW or MSFU?

On fees, MSFW is cheaper at 0.99% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, MSFW or MSFU?

MSFW is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.04% for MSFU.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MSFW or MSFU?

MSFW has the higher dividend yield at 48.66%, compared with 14.56% for MSFU.

What is the main difference between MSFW and MSFU?

MSFW is categorized as Derivative Income, while MSFU is Leveraged Equities. They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for MSFW and 1.04% for MSFU.