PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MSFW vs. GOOW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MSFW vs. GOOW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill MSFT WeeklyPay™ ETF (MSFW) and Roundhill GOOGL WeeklyPay™ ETF (GOOW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MSFW achieves a -14.73% return, which is significantly lower than GOOW's 15.42% return.


MSFW

1D
-3.61%
1M
4.05%
YTD
-14.73%
6M
-13.76%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

GOOW

1D
-0.89%
1M
-7.95%
YTD
15.42%
6M
11.81%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MSFW vs. GOOW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
MSFW
Roundhill MSFT WeeklyPay™ ETF
-14.73%-7.81%
GOOW
Roundhill GOOGL WeeklyPay™ ETF
15.42%75.51%

Correlation

The correlation between MSFW and GOOW is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 25, 2025

0.16

MSFW vs. GOOW - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
MSFW
GOOW

Technology

31.6%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

100.0%

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Technology

MSFW
31.6%
GOOW

-

Basic Materials

MSFW

-

GOOW

-

Communication Services

MSFW

-

GOOW
100.0%

Consumer Cyclical

MSFW

-

GOOW

-

Consumer Defensive

MSFW

-

GOOW

-

Energy

MSFW

-

GOOW

-

Financial Services

MSFW

-

GOOW

-

Healthcare

MSFW

-

GOOW

-

Industrials

MSFW

-

GOOW

-

Real Estate

MSFW

-

GOOW

-

Utilities

MSFW

-

GOOW

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MSFW vs. GOOW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill MSFT WeeklyPay™ ETF (MSFW) and Roundhill GOOGL WeeklyPay™ ETF (GOOW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

MSFW vs. GOOW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MSFWGOOWDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.76

3.43

-4.19

Drawdowns

MSFW vs. GOOW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MSFW drawdown since its inception was -40.42%, which is greater than GOOW's maximum drawdown of -24.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSFW and GOOW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MSFWGOOWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.42%

-24.88%

-15.54%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-26.27%

-13.20%

-13.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.45%

-4.80%

-12.65%

Volatility

MSFW vs. GOOW - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MSFWGOOWDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

32.40%

37.38%

-4.98%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

32.40%

37.38%

-4.98%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.40%

37.38%

-4.98%

MSFW vs. GOOW - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both MSFW and GOOW have an expense ratio of 0.99%.


Dividends

MSFW vs. GOOW - Dividend Comparison

MSFW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 39.31%, more than GOOW's 35.21% yield.


PositionTTM2025
GOOW
Roundhill GOOGL WeeklyPay™ ETF
35.21%19.77%
MSFW
Roundhill MSFT WeeklyPay™ ETF
39.31%20.25%

Frequently Asked Questions


MSFW and GOOW have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.99% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

MSFW and GOOW have the same expense ratio: 0.99% per year.

MSFW has the higher dividend yield at 39.31%, compared with 35.21% for GOOW.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MSFW and GOOW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer