MSFW vs. GOOW
MSFW (Roundhill MSFT WeeklyPay™ ETF) and GOOW (Roundhill GOOGL WeeklyPay™ ETF) are both Derivative Income funds from Roundhill. Both are actively managed. At a 0.16 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.99% expense ratio.
Performance
MSFW vs. GOOW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MSFW achieves a -14.73% return, which is significantly lower than GOOW's 15.42% return.
MSFW
- 1D
- -3.61%
- 1M
- 4.05%
- YTD
- -14.73%
- 6M
- -13.76%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GOOW
- 1D
- -0.89%
- 1M
- -7.95%
- YTD
- 15.42%
- 6M
- 11.81%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MSFW vs. GOOW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
MSFW Roundhill MSFT WeeklyPay™ ETF | -14.73% | -7.81% |
GOOW Roundhill GOOGL WeeklyPay™ ETF | 15.42% | 75.51% |
Correlation
The correlation between MSFW and GOOW is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 25, 2025 | 0.16 |
MSFW vs. GOOW - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
MSFW
GOOW
Technology
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
MSFW
GOOW
-
Basic Materials
MSFW
-
GOOW
-
Communication Services
MSFW
-
GOOW
Consumer Cyclical
MSFW
-
GOOW
-
Consumer Defensive
MSFW
-
GOOW
-
Energy
MSFW
-
GOOW
-
Financial Services
MSFW
-
GOOW
-
Healthcare
MSFW
-
GOOW
-
Industrials
MSFW
-
GOOW
-
Real Estate
MSFW
-
GOOW
-
Utilities
MSFW
-
GOOW
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MSFW vs. GOOW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill MSFT WeeklyPay™ ETF (MSFW) and Roundhill GOOGL WeeklyPay™ ETF (GOOW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MSFW | GOOW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.76 | 3.43 | -4.19 |
Drawdowns
MSFW vs. GOOW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MSFW drawdown since its inception was -40.42%, which is greater than GOOW's maximum drawdown of -24.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSFW and GOOW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MSFW | GOOW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.42% | -24.88% | -15.54% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -26.27% | -13.20% | -13.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.45% | -4.80% | -12.65% |
Volatility
MSFW vs. GOOW - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MSFW | GOOW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 32.40% | 37.38% | -4.98% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.40% | 37.38% | -4.98% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.40% | 37.38% | -4.98% |
MSFW vs. GOOW - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both MSFW and GOOW have an expense ratio of 0.99%.
Dividends
MSFW vs. GOOW - Dividend Comparison
MSFW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 39.31%, more than GOOW's 35.21% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
GOOW Roundhill GOOGL WeeklyPay™ ETF | 35.21% | 19.77% |
MSFW Roundhill MSFT WeeklyPay™ ETF | 39.31% | 20.25% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MSFW and GOOW have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.99% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MSFW and GOOW have the same expense ratio: 0.99% per year.
MSFW has the higher dividend yield at 39.31%, compared with 35.21% for GOOW.
Find the right allocation for MSFW and GOOW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer