MSFW vs. MSFX
MSFW (Roundhill MSFT WeeklyPay™ ETF) and MSFX (T-Rex 2X Long Microsoft Daily Target ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MSFW is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Roundhill, while MSFX is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by T-Rex. Both are actively managed. With a 0.99 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. MSFW charges 0.99%/yr vs 1.05%/yr for MSFX.
Performance
MSFW vs. MSFX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MSFW achieves a -27.29% return, which is significantly higher than MSFX's -45.81% return.
MSFW
- 1D
- 2.55%
- 1M
- -12.61%
- YTD
- -27.29%
- 6M
- -27.90%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MSFX
- 1D
- 3.49%
- 1M
- -21.88%
- YTD
- -45.81%
- 6M
- -46.59%
- 1Y
- -51.08%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MSFW vs. MSFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
MSFW Roundhill MSFT WeeklyPay™ ETF | -27.29% | -7.80% |
MSFX T-Rex 2X Long Microsoft Daily Target ETF | -45.81% | -15.74% |
Correlation
The correlation between MSFW and MSFX is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 24, 2025 | 0.99 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MSFW vs. MSFX — Risk / Return Rank
MSFW
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
MSFX
MSFW vs. MSFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill MSFT WeeklyPay™ ETF (MSFW) and T-Rex 2X Long Microsoft Daily Target ETF (MSFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MSFW | MSFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 0.82 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | -0.84 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | -1.50 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MSFW vs. MSFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MSFW drawdown since its inception was -40.42%, smaller than the maximum MSFX drawdown of -60.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSFW and MSFX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MSFW | MSFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.42% | -60.86% | +20.44% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -60.86% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -37.13% | -58.98% | +21.85% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.26% | -21.90% | +3.64% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 34.08% | — |
Volatility
MSFW vs. MSFX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MSFW | MSFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 22.72% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 46.56% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 32.71% | 52.30% | -19.59% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.71% | 49.70% | -16.99% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.71% | 49.70% | -16.99% |
MSFW vs. MSFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MSFW has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is lower than MSFX's 1.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
MSFW vs. MSFX - Dividend Comparison
MSFW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 48.66%, more than MSFX's 9.86% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
MSFW Roundhill MSFT WeeklyPay™ ETF | 48.66% | 20.25% |
MSFX T-Rex 2X Long Microsoft Daily Target ETF | 9.86% | 5.34% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.99, MSFW and MSFX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, MSFW is cheaper at 0.99% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MSFW is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for MSFX.
MSFW has the higher dividend yield at 48.66%, compared with 9.86% for MSFX.
MSFW is categorized as Derivative Income, while MSFX is Leveraged Equities. They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and T-Rex. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for MSFW and 1.05% for MSFX.
Find the right allocation for MSFW and MSFX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer