PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MSFW vs. MSFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MSFW vs. MSFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill MSFT WeeklyPay™ ETF (MSFW) and T-Rex 2X Long Microsoft Daily Target ETF (MSFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MSFW achieves a -14.73% return, which is significantly higher than MSFX's -28.34% return.


MSFW

1D
-3.61%
1M
4.05%
YTD
-14.73%
6M
-13.76%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

MSFX

1D
-6.67%
1M
5.21%
YTD
-28.34%
6M
-29.12%
1Y
-29.20%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MSFW vs. MSFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
MSFW
Roundhill MSFT WeeklyPay™ ETF
-14.73%-7.81%
MSFX
T-Rex 2X Long Microsoft Daily Target ETF
-28.34%-17.41%

Correlation

The correlation between MSFW and MSFX is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 25, 2025

0.99

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MSFW vs. MSFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MSFW

MSFX
MSFX Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
MSFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MSFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
MSFX Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
MSFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
MSFX Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MSFW vs. MSFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill MSFT WeeklyPay™ ETF (MSFW) and T-Rex 2X Long Microsoft Daily Target ETF (MSFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

MSFW vs. MSFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MSFWMSFXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.58

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.76

-0.17

-0.59

Drawdowns

MSFW vs. MSFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MSFW drawdown since its inception was -40.42%, smaller than the maximum MSFX drawdown of -60.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSFW and MSFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MSFWMSFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.42%

-60.86%

+20.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-60.86%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-26.27%

-45.75%

+19.48%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.45%

-21.24%

+3.79%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

31.80%

Volatility

MSFW vs. MSFX - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MSFWMSFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

19.56%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

45.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

32.40%

50.40%

-18.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

32.40%

49.33%

-16.93%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.40%

49.33%

-16.93%

MSFW vs. MSFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MSFW has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is lower than MSFX's 1.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

MSFW vs. MSFX - Dividend Comparison

MSFW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 39.31%, more than MSFX's 7.45% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.99, MSFW and MSFX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, MSFW is cheaper at 0.99% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

MSFW is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for MSFX.

MSFW has the higher dividend yield at 39.31%, compared with 7.45% for MSFX.

MSFW is categorized as Derivative Income, while MSFX is Leveraged Equities. They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and T-Rex. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for MSFW and 1.05% for MSFX.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MSFW and MSFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer