MPLX vs. CQP

In the year-to-date period, MPLX achieves a 11.88% return, which is significantly lower than CQP's 13.51% return. Over the past 10 years, MPLX has underperformed CQP with an annualized return of 4.45%, while CQP has yielded a comparatively higher 13.48% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MPLX LP (MPLX) and Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P. (CQP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current MPLX Sharpe Ratio is 1.91, which is higher than the CQP Sharpe Ratio of 1.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MPLX and CQP, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

MPLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.88%, more than CQP's 5.46% yield.

The maximum MPLX drawdown since its inception was -85.72%, which is greater than CQP's maximum drawdown of -78.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MPLX and CQP. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

The current volatility for MPLX LP (MPLX) is 11.42%, while Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P. (CQP) has a volatility of 17.46%. This indicates that MPLX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CQP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between MPLX LP and Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.