MPLX vs. ENFR

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about MPLX LP (MPLX) and Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF (ENFR).

ENFR is a passively managed fund by SS&C that tracks the performance of the Alerian Midstream Energy Select Index. It was launched on Nov 1, 2013.

Performance

MPLX vs. ENFR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MPLX LP (MPLX) and Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF (ENFR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

MPLX vs. ENFR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
MPLX MPLX LP	9.03%	20.54%	41.72%	22.46%	21.09%	53.92%	-1.79%	-8.25%	-8.43%	9.00%
ENFR Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF	22.85%	5.88%	42.17%	15.63%	17.48%	39.97%	-24.14%	21.60%	-18.67%	-0.19%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MPLX achieves a 9.03% return, which is significantly lower than ENFR's 22.85% return. Over the past 10 years, MPLX has outperformed ENFR with an annualized return of 17.19%, while ENFR has yielded a comparatively lower 13.64% annualized return.

MPLX

• 1D: -1.04%
• 1M: -3.17%
• YTD: 9.03%
• 6M: 18.98%
• 1Y: 15.36%
• 3Y*: 28.58%
• 5Y*: 27.90%
• 10Y*: 17.19%

ENFR

• 1D: -1.39%
• 1M: 4.03%
• YTD: 22.85%
• 6M: 20.70%
• 1Y: 22.29%
• 3Y*: 28.68%
• 5Y*: 23.59%
• 10Y*: 13.64%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

MPLX vs. ENFR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MPLX

MPLX Risk / Return Rank: 66
MPLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
MPLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
MPLX Omega Ratio Rank: 61
MPLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
MPLX Martin Ratio Rank: 73

ENFR

ENFR Risk / Return Rank: 66
ENFR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 73
ENFR Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
ENFR Omega Ratio Rank: 71
ENFR Calmar Ratio Rank: 63
ENFR Martin Ratio Rank: 54

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MPLX vs. ENFR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MPLX LP (MPLX) and Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF (ENFR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MPLX	ENFR	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.82	1.25	-0.43
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.19	1.63	-0.44
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.16	1.25	-0.09
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.07	1.49	-0.43
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	3.80	4.94	-1.13
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MPLX vs. ENFR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MPLX Sharpe Ratio is 0.82, which is lower than the ENFR Sharpe Ratio of 1.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MPLX and ENFR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MPLX	ENFR	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.82	1.25	-0.43
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.44	1.24	+0.20
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.56	0.55	+0.01
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.39	0.34	+0.05

Correlation

The correlation between MPLX and ENFR is 0.66, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

MPLX vs. ENFR - Dividend Comparison

MPLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.12%, more than ENFR's 4.02% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
MPLX MPLX LP	7.12%	7.39%	7.33%	8.65%	8.80%	11.30%	12.70%	10.41%	8.22%	6.23%	5.86%	4.33%
ENFR Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF	4.02%	4.77%	4.41%	5.48%	5.23%	7.86%	7.57%	5.81%	3.98%	2.98%	3.31%	3.34%

Drawdowns

MPLX vs. ENFR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MPLX drawdown since its inception was -85.72%, which is greater than ENFR's maximum drawdown of -68.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MPLX and ENFR.

Drawdown Indicators

	MPLX	ENFR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-85.72%	-68.28%	-17.44%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.38%	-14.80%	+1.42%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-18.46%	-20.29%	+1.83%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-75.21%	-62.64%	-12.57%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.55%	-2.18%	-1.37%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-30.33%	-16.16%	-14.17%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.75%	4.47%	-0.72%

Volatility

MPLX vs. ENFR - Volatility Comparison

MPLX LP (MPLX) has a higher volatility of 3.97% compared to Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF (ENFR) at 3.72%. This indicates that MPLX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ENFR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MPLX	ENFR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.97%	3.72%	+0.25%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.15%	10.21%	+0.94%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.89%	17.91%	+0.98%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.54%	19.18%	+0.36%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	30.91%	24.74%	+6.17%