MOTI vs. HODL
MOTI (VanEck Vectors Morningstar International Moat ETF) and HODL (VanEck Bitcoin Trust) are both exchange-traded funds - MOTI is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the Morningstar Global ex-US Moat Focus Index, while HODL is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate - New York Variant. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, MOTI returned 9.33% vs -43.00% for HODL. Their 0.30 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. MOTI charges 0.57%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for HODL.
Performance
MOTI vs. HODL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MOTI achieves a 0.88% return, which is significantly higher than HODL's -25.88% return.
MOTI
- 1D
- 0.32%
- 1M
- 7.79%
- 6M
- -2.03%
- YTD
- 0.88%
- 1Y
- 9.33%
- 3Y*
- 8.12%
- 5Y*
- 5.10%
- 10Y*
- 7.05%
- ALL TIME*
- 5.44%
HODL
- 1D
- 0.94%
- 1M
- 1.78%
- 6M
- -11.66%
- YTD
- -25.88%
- 1Y
- -43.00%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 11.70%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $21.67M | $18.55M | $23.31M | |
| $159.40K | $183.16K | $337.60K |
MOTI vs. HODL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
MOTI VanEck Vectors Morningstar International Moat ETF | 0.88% | 25.01% | 4.49% |
HODL VanEck Bitcoin Trust | -25.88% | -6.42% | 91.50% |
Correlation
The correlation between MOTI and HODL is 0.38, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.38 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 11, 2024 | 0.30 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MOTI vs. HODL — Risk / Return Rank
MOTI
HODL
MOTI vs. HODL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Vectors Morningstar International Moat ETF (MOTI) and VanEck Bitcoin Trust (HODL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MOTI | HODL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.60 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.37 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 0.84 | +0.27 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.59 | -0.81 | +1.40 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.24 | -1.23 | +2.47 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MOTI vs. HODL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MOTI drawdown since its inception was -36.70%, smaller than the maximum HODL drawdown of -53.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MOTI and HODL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MOTI | HODL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.70% | -53.20% | +16.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.95% | -53.20% | +37.25% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.95% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.71% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.70% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.02% | -48.35% | +43.33% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.17% | -18.32% | +9.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.54% | 34.97% | -27.43% |
Volatility
MOTI vs. HODL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for VanEck Vectors Morningstar International Moat ETF (MOTI) is 5.62%, while VanEck Bitcoin Trust (HODL) has a volatility of 8.27%. This indicates that MOTI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HODL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MOTI | HODL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.62% | 8.27% | -2.65% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.16% | 32.98% | -20.82% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.96% | 44.24% | -29.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.66% | 49.17% | -31.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.80% | 49.17% | -31.37% |
MOTI vs. HODL - Expense Ratio Comparison
MOTI has a 0.57% expense ratio, which is higher than HODL's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
MOTI vs. HODL - Dividend Comparison
MOTI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.19%, while HODL has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HODL VanEck Bitcoin Trust | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MOTI VanEck Vectors Morningstar International Moat ETF | 3.19% | 3.22% | 4.79% | 2.34% | 3.27% | 4.67% | 2.14% | 3.90% | 3.73% | 8.87% | 1.33% | 0.84% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MOTI and HODL have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HODL has higher volatility (8.27%) compared to MOTI (5.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MOTI dropped -36.70% vs HODL's -53.20%.
On 1-year performance, MOTI leads with 9.33% vs -43.00% for HODL. On fees, HODL is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, MOTI has been the lower-risk option at 5.62%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, MOTI has performed better with a 9.33% return vs -43.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
HODL is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.57% for MOTI.
MOTI has the higher dividend yield at 3.19%, compared with 0.00% for HODL.
MOTI is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while HODL is Cryptocurrency. MOTI tracks Morningstar Global ex-US Moat Focus Index, while HODL tracks CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate - New York Variant. Their fees differ too: 0.57% for MOTI and 0.25% for HODL.
MOTI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.63 vs -0.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MOTI and HODL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer