MOTI vs. IWY

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

MOTI (VanEck Vectors Morningstar International Moat ETF) and IWY (iShares Russell Top 200 Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MOTI is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the Morningstar Global ex-US Moat Focus Index, while IWY is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Russell Top 200 Growth Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, MOTI returned 6.18%/yr vs 19.74%/yr for IWY. A 0.55 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MOTI charges 0.57%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for IWY.

Performance

MOTI vs. IWY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Vectors Morningstar International Moat ETF (MOTI) and iShares Russell Top 200 Growth ETF (IWY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MOTI achieves a -5.94% return, which is significantly lower than IWY's 8.73% return. Over the past 10 years, MOTI has underperformed IWY with an annualized return of 6.18%, while IWY has yielded a comparatively higher 19.74% annualized return.

MOTI

• 1D: -0.23%
• 1M: -1.60%
• YTD: -5.94%
• 6M: -3.94%
• 1Y: 3.67%
• 3Y*: 7.02%
• 5Y*: 2.08%
• 10Y*: 6.18%

IWY

• 1D: -0.42%
• 1M: 7.07%
• YTD: 8.73%
• 6M: 7.99%
• 1Y: 29.25%
• 3Y*: 26.07%
• 5Y*: 17.12%
• 10Y*: 19.74%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MOTI vs. IWY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
MOTI VanEck Vectors Morningstar International Moat ETF	-5.94%	25.01%	1.94%	10.18%	-6.93%	0.03%	7.24%	17.63%	-13.92%	34.27%
IWY iShares Russell Top 200 Growth ETF	8.73%	18.19%	34.89%	46.49%	-29.91%	31.05%	39.01%	36.20%	-0.72%	31.69%

Correlation

The correlation between MOTI and IWY is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.46
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.45
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.53
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.56
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 15, 2015	0.55

The correlation between MOTI and IWY shifts across timeframes, from 0.45 (3 years) to 0.56 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

MOTI vs. IWY - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	MOTI	IWY
Consumer Defensive	23.4%	3.0%
Industrials	22.2%	4.0%
Healthcare	15.1%	6.6%
Technology	10.5%	54.9%
Consumer Cyclical	10.3%	11.4%
Communication Services	9.3%	13.9%
Basic Materials	5.8%	0.3%
Financial Services	3.2%	5.6%
Energy	-	0.0%
Real Estate	-	0.3%
Utilities	-	1.1%

Return for Risk

MOTI vs. IWY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MOTI

MOTI Risk / Return Rank: 12
MOTI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 13
MOTI Sortino Ratio Rank: 12
MOTI Omega Ratio Rank: 11
MOTI Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
MOTI Martin Ratio Rank: 12

IWY

IWY Risk / Return Rank: 47
IWY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
IWY Sortino Ratio Rank: 53
IWY Omega Ratio Rank: 53
IWY Calmar Ratio Rank: 36
IWY Martin Ratio Rank: 37

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MOTI vs. IWY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Vectors Morningstar International Moat ETF (MOTI) and iShares Russell Top 200 Growth ETF (IWY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MOTI	IWY	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.26	1.90	-1.64
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.46	2.57	-2.11
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.05	1.33	-0.27
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.23	1.82	-1.59
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	0.64	5.94	-5.31
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MOTI vs. IWY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MOTI Sharpe Ratio is 0.26, which is lower than the IWY Sharpe Ratio of 1.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MOTI and IWY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MOTI	IWY	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.26	1.90	-1.64
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.12	0.80	-0.68
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.34	0.94	-0.60
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.26	0.93	-0.66

Drawdowns

MOTI vs. IWY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MOTI drawdown since its inception was -36.70%, which is greater than IWY's maximum drawdown of -32.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MOTI and IWY.

Drawdown Indicators

	MOTI	IWY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-36.70%	-32.68%	-4.02%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.45%	-16.63%	+1.18%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.35%	-23.22%	+6.87%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-31.14%	-32.68%	+1.54%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-36.70%	-32.68%	-4.02%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-11.45%	-0.42%	-11.03%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.13%	-4.75%	-4.38%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.65%	5.09%	+0.56%

Volatility

MOTI vs. IWY - Volatility Comparison

VanEck Vectors Morningstar International Moat ETF (MOTI) has a higher volatility of 4.22% compared to iShares Russell Top 200 Growth ETF (IWY) at 3.30%. This indicates that MOTI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IWY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MOTI	IWY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.22%	3.30%	+0.92%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.00%	11.57%	-0.57%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.26%	15.48%	-1.22%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.53%	21.47%	-3.94%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.08%	20.97%	-2.89%

MOTI vs. IWY - Expense Ratio Comparison

MOTI has a 0.57% expense ratio, which is higher than IWY's 0.20% expense ratio.

Dividends

MOTI vs. IWY - Dividend Comparison

MOTI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.43%, more than IWY's 0.32% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
IWY iShares Russell Top 200 Growth ETF	0.32%	0.36%	0.42%	0.68%	0.88%	0.50%	0.71%	1.06%	1.32%	1.26%	1.51%	1.58%
MOTI VanEck Vectors Morningstar International Moat ETF	3.43%	3.22%	4.79%	2.34%	3.27%	4.67%	2.14%	3.90%	3.73%	8.87%	1.33%	0.84%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MOTI and IWY in my portfolio?

MOTI and IWY have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MOTI or IWY?

MOTI has higher volatility (4.22%) compared to IWY (3.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MOTI dropped -36.70% vs IWY's -32.68%.

Which ETF is better, MOTI or IWY?

On 10-year performance, IWY leads with 19.74% vs 6.18% for MOTI. On fees, IWY is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, IWY has been the lower-risk option at 3.30%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, MOTI or IWY?

Over the 10-year period, IWY has performed better with a 19.74% return vs 6.18%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, MOTI or IWY?

IWY is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.57% for MOTI.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MOTI or IWY?

MOTI has the higher dividend yield at 3.43%, compared with 0.32% for IWY.

What is the main difference between MOTI and IWY?

MOTI is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while IWY is Large Cap Growth Equities. MOTI tracks Morningstar Global ex-US Moat Focus Index, while IWY tracks Russell Top 200 Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.57% for MOTI and 0.20% for IWY.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

IWY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.90 vs 0.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.