PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MOTI vs. MOAT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MOTI vs. MOAT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Vectors Morningstar International Moat ETF (MOTI) and VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF (MOAT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MOTI achieves a -9.93% return, which is significantly lower than MOAT's -2.39% return. Over the past 10 years, MOTI has underperformed MOAT with an annualized return of 6.50%, while MOAT has yielded a comparatively higher 13.64% annualized return.


MOTI

1D
-1.04%
1M
-5.33%
YTD
-9.93%
6M
-9.29%
1Y
0.81%
3Y*
5.68%
5Y*
1.74%
10Y*
6.50%

MOAT

1D
0.09%
1M
-1.13%
YTD
-2.39%
6M
-2.98%
1Y
12.04%
3Y*
10.36%
5Y*
7.68%
10Y*
13.64%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MOTI vs. MOAT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MOTI
VanEck Vectors Morningstar International Moat ETF
-9.93%25.01%1.94%10.18%-6.93%0.03%7.24%17.63%-13.92%34.27%
MOAT
VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF
-2.39%13.20%10.73%31.89%-13.66%24.12%14.84%34.79%-1.28%23.18%

Correlation

The correlation between MOTI and MOAT is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.66

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.60

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.65

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 14, 2015

0.63

The correlation between MOTI and MOAT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.60 to 0.66 - a consistent structural relationship.

MOTI vs. MOAT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
MOTI
MOAT

Industrials

23.0%
13.8%

Consumer Defensive

20.9%
17.0%

Healthcare

13.0%
15.9%

Consumer Cyclical

12.6%
7.3%

Technology

10.6%
33.8%

Basic Materials

9.3%

-

Communication Services

7.3%
2.4%

Financial Services

3.4%
9.0%

Energy

-

-

Real Estate

-

0.8%

Utilities

-

-

Industrials

MOTI
23.0%
MOAT
13.8%

Consumer Defensive

MOTI
20.9%
MOAT
17.0%

Healthcare

MOTI
13.0%
MOAT
15.9%

Consumer Cyclical

MOTI
12.6%
MOAT
7.3%

Technology

MOTI
10.6%
MOAT
33.8%

Basic Materials

MOTI
9.3%
MOAT

-

Communication Services

MOTI
7.3%
MOAT
2.4%

Financial Services

MOTI
3.4%
MOAT
9.0%

Energy

MOTI

-

MOAT

-

Real Estate

MOTI

-

MOAT
0.8%

Utilities

MOTI

-

MOAT

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MOTI vs. MOAT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MOTI
MOTI Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
MOTI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MOTI Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
MOTI Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
MOTI Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
MOTI Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank

MOAT
MOAT Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
MOAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MOAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
MOAT Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
MOAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
MOAT Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MOTI vs. MOAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Vectors Morningstar International Moat ETF (MOTI) and VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF (MOAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MOTIMOATDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.81

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.14

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.02

1.15

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.05

0.97

-0.92

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.13

2.92

-2.80

MOTI vs. MOAT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MOTI Sharpe Ratio is 0.06, which is lower than the MOAT Sharpe Ratio of 0.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MOTI and MOAT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MOTI vs. MOAT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MOTI drawdown since its inception was -36.70%, which is greater than MOAT's maximum drawdown of -33.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MOTI and MOAT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MOTIMOATDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.70%

-33.31%

-3.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.45%

-12.43%

-3.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.35%

-21.44%

+5.09%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.77%

-23.96%

-4.81%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.70%

-33.31%

-3.39%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-15.20%

-6.12%

-9.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.15%

-3.83%

-5.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.44%

4.13%

+2.31%

Volatility

MOTI vs. MOAT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for VanEck Vectors Morningstar International Moat ETF (MOTI) is 3.06%, while VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF (MOAT) has a volatility of 4.72%. This indicates that MOTI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MOAT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MOTIMOATDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.06%

4.72%

-1.66%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.09%

10.23%

+0.86%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.40%

13.99%

+0.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.54%

18.24%

-0.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.82%

18.65%

-0.83%

MOTI vs. MOAT - Expense Ratio Comparison

MOTI has a 0.57% expense ratio, which is higher than MOAT's 0.47% expense ratio.


Dividends

MOTI vs. MOAT - Dividend Comparison

MOTI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.58%, more than MOAT's 1.39% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MOAT
VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF
1.39%1.36%1.37%0.86%1.25%1.08%1.46%1.31%1.79%1.07%1.17%2.13%
MOTI
VanEck Vectors Morningstar International Moat ETF
3.58%3.22%4.79%2.34%3.27%4.67%2.14%3.90%3.73%8.87%1.33%0.84%

Frequently Asked Questions


MOTI and MOAT have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MOAT has higher volatility (4.72%) compared to MOTI (3.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MOTI dropped -36.70% vs MOAT's -33.31%.

On 10-year performance, MOAT leads with 13.64% vs 6.50% for MOTI. On fees, MOAT is cheaper at 0.47% per year. On volatility, MOTI has been the lower-risk option at 3.06%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, MOAT has performed better with a 13.64% return vs 6.50%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

MOAT is cheaper with a 0.47% expense ratio, compared with 0.57% for MOTI.

MOTI has the higher dividend yield at 3.58%, compared with 1.39% for MOAT.

MOTI is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while MOAT is Large Cap Blend Equities. MOTI tracks Morningstar Global ex-US Moat Focus Index, while MOAT tracks Morningstar Wide Moat Focus Index. Their fees differ too: 0.57% for MOTI and 0.47% for MOAT.

MOAT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.87 vs 0.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MOTI and MOAT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer