PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MOTG vs. HODL
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

MOTG vs. HODL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Morningstar Global Wide Moat ETF (MOTG) and VanEck Bitcoin Trust (HODL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

MOTG vs. HODL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
MOTG
VanEck Morningstar Global Wide Moat ETF
-3.13%26.06%10.39%
HODL
VanEck Bitcoin Trust
-22.04%-6.42%99.75%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MOTG achieves a -3.13% return, which is significantly higher than HODL's -22.04% return.


MOTG

1D
1.34%
1M
-6.39%
YTD
-3.13%
6M
-2.37%
1Y
13.68%
3Y*
12.09%
5Y*
7.03%
10Y*

HODL

1D
0.63%
1M
-1.38%
YTD
-22.04%
6M
-42.00%
1Y
-19.80%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


MOTG vs. HODL - Expense Ratio Comparison

MOTG has a 0.52% expense ratio, which is higher than HODL's 0.25% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

MOTG vs. HODL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MOTG
MOTG Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
MOTG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MOTG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
MOTG Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
MOTG Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
MOTG Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank

HODL
HODL Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
HODL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HODL Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
HODL Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
HODL Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
HODL Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MOTG vs. HODL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Morningstar Global Wide Moat ETF (MOTG) and VanEck Bitcoin Trust (HODL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MOTGHODLDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.80

-0.44

+1.24

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.24

-0.37

+1.61

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

0.96

+0.21

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.09

-0.35

+1.44

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.30

-0.75

+5.04

MOTG vs. HODL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MOTG Sharpe Ratio is 0.80, which is higher than the HODL Sharpe Ratio of -0.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MOTG and HODL, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MOTGHODLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.80

-0.44

+1.24

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.45

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.63

0.37

+0.26

Correlation

The correlation between MOTG and HODL is 0.37, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

MOTG vs. HODL - Dividend Comparison

MOTG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 18.33%, while HODL has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018
MOTG
VanEck Morningstar Global Wide Moat ETF
18.33%17.75%5.60%1.86%3.64%5.88%2.96%3.91%0.45%
HODL
VanEck Bitcoin Trust
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

MOTG vs. HODL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MOTG drawdown since its inception was -31.82%, smaller than the maximum HODL drawdown of -49.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MOTG and HODL.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


MOTGHODLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.82%

-49.25%

+17.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.56%

-49.25%

+36.69%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.29%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.44%

-45.67%

+37.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.93%

-14.14%

+9.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.19%

23.20%

-20.01%

Volatility

MOTG vs. HODL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for VanEck Morningstar Global Wide Moat ETF (MOTG) is 6.61%, while VanEck Bitcoin Trust (HODL) has a volatility of 12.99%. This indicates that MOTG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HODL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


MOTGHODLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.61%

12.99%

-6.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.58%

36.72%

-26.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.11%

45.07%

-27.96%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.70%

50.90%

-35.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.89%

50.90%

-33.01%