MOTG vs. SPY
MOTG (VanEck Morningstar Global Wide Moat ETF) and SPY (State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MOTG is a Global Equities fund tracking the Morningstar Global Wide Moat Focus Index, while SPY is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, MOTG returned 7.23%/yr vs 12.76%/yr for SPY. Their correlation of 0.86 means they have usually moved in the same direction. MOTG charges 0.52%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for SPY.
Performance
MOTG vs. SPY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MOTG achieves a 3.60% return, which is significantly lower than SPY's 10.13% return.
MOTG
- 1D
- 0.13%
- 1M
- 4.10%
- 6M
- 0.04%
- YTD
- 3.60%
- 1Y
- 11.45%
- 3Y*
- 12.96%
- 5Y*
- 7.23%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 11.62%
SPY
- 1D
- 0.72%
- 1M
- 0.30%
- 6M
- 8.53%
- YTD
- 10.13%
- 1Y
- 21.49%
- 3Y*
- 19.32%
- 5Y*
- 12.76%
- 10Y*
- 15.07%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.79%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $12.56K | $25.37K | $44.36K | |
| $37.27B | $35.99B | $39.23B |
MOTG vs. SPY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MOTG VanEck Morningstar Global Wide Moat ETF | 3.60% | 26.06% | 9.31% | 11.00% | -11.34% | 14.68% | 16.06% | 30.43% | -3.89% |
SPY State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 10.13% | 17.72% | 24.89% | 26.18% | -18.18% | 28.73% | 18.33% | 31.22% | -6.12% |
Correlation
The correlation between MOTG and SPY is 0.76, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.76 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.77 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.84 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 31, 2018 | 0.86 |
The correlation between MOTG and SPY shifts across timeframes, from 0.76 (1 year) to 0.86 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
MOTG vs. SPY - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
MOTG
SPY
Industrials
Technology
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
Communication Services
Basic Materials
Energy
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Industrials
MOTG
SPY
Technology
MOTG
SPY
Consumer Defensive
MOTG
SPY
Healthcare
MOTG
SPY
Consumer Cyclical
MOTG
SPY
Financial Services
MOTG
SPY
Communication Services
MOTG
SPY
Basic Materials
MOTG
SPY
Energy
MOTG
-
SPY
Real Estate
MOTG
-
SPY
Utilities
MOTG
-
SPY
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MOTG vs. SPY — Risk / Return Rank
MOTG
SPY
MOTG vs. SPY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Morningstar Global Wide Moat ETF (MOTG) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MOTG | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.77 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.96 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.27 | -0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.84 | 2.20 | -1.36 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.39 | 9.40 | -7.01 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MOTG vs. SPY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MOTG drawdown since its inception was -31.82%, smaller than the maximum SPY drawdown of -55.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MOTG and SPY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MOTG | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.82% | -55.19% | +23.37% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.56% | -8.88% | -3.68% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.59% | -18.76% | +4.17% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.29% | -24.50% | +0.21% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.72% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.08% | -1.40% | -0.68% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.97% | -9.01% | +4.04% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.43% | 2.08% | +2.35% |
Volatility
MOTG vs. SPY - Volatility Comparison
VanEck Morningstar Global Wide Moat ETF (MOTG) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY) have volatilities of 3.46% and 3.58%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MOTG | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.46% | 3.58% | -0.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.57% | 10.14% | +1.43% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.19% | 12.89% | +1.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.90% | 17.18% | -1.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.76% | 17.95% | -0.19% |
MOTG vs. SPY - Expense Ratio Comparison
MOTG has a 0.52% expense ratio, which is higher than SPY's 0.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
MOTG vs. SPY - Dividend Comparison
MOTG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 17.14%, more than SPY's 1.01% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MOTG VanEck Morningstar Global Wide Moat ETF | 17.14% | 17.75% | 5.60% | 1.86% | 3.64% | 5.88% | 2.96% | 3.91% | 0.45% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPY State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 1.01% | 1.07% | 1.21% | 1.40% | 1.65% | 1.20% | 1.52% | 1.75% | 2.04% | 1.80% | 2.03% | 2.06% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MOTG and SPY have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SPY has higher volatility (3.58%) compared to MOTG (3.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MOTG dropped -31.82% vs SPY's -55.19%.
On 5-year performance, SPY leads with 12.76% vs 7.23% for MOTG. On fees, SPY is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, MOTG has been the lower-risk option at 3.46%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, SPY has performed better with a 12.76% return vs 7.23%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPY is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.52% for MOTG.
MOTG has the higher dividend yield at 17.14%, compared with 1.01% for SPY.
MOTG is categorized as Global Equities, while SPY is S&P 500. MOTG tracks Morningstar Global Wide Moat Focus Index, while SPY tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.52% for MOTG and 0.09% for SPY.
SPY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.52 vs 0.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MOTG and SPY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer