MOTG vs. EATZ

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

MOTG (VanEck Morningstar Global Wide Moat ETF) and EATZ (AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MOTG is a Global Equities fund tracking the Morningstar Global Wide Moat Focus Index, while EATZ is a Consumer Discretionary Equities fund actively managed by AdvisorShares. MOTG is passively managed, while EATZ is actively managed. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MOTG charges 0.52%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for EATZ.

Performance

MOTG vs. EATZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Morningstar Global Wide Moat ETF (MOTG) and AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF (EATZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

MOTG

• 1D: -0.69%
• 1M: -3.06%
• YTD: -2.84%
• 6M: -2.92%
• 1Y: 6.82%
• 3Y*: 11.97%
• 5Y*: 6.03%
• 10Y*: —

EATZ

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MOTG vs. EATZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
MOTG VanEck Morningstar Global Wide Moat ETF	-2.84%	26.06%	9.31%	11.00%	-11.34%	4.54%
EATZ AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF	4.80%	-6.67%	23.21%	25.23%	-20.68%	-4.90%

Correlation

The correlation between MOTG and EATZ is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.51
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.60
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.65
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 21, 2021	0.64

The correlation between MOTG and EATZ shifts across timeframes, from 0.51 (1 year) to 0.65 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

MOTG vs. EATZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	MOTG	EATZ
Industrials	26.3%	4.9%
Technology	19.3%	-
Consumer Defensive	16.8%	16.9%
Healthcare	14.1%	-
Consumer Cyclical	9.5%	78.2%
Communication Services	6.6%	2.3%
Financial Services	6.3%	-
Basic Materials	1.1%	-
Energy	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

MOTG vs. EATZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MOTG

MOTG Risk / Return Rank: 16
MOTG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 16
MOTG Sortino Ratio Rank: 16
MOTG Omega Ratio Rank: 15
MOTG Calmar Ratio Rank: 15
MOTG Martin Ratio Rank: 17

EATZ

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MOTG vs. EATZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Morningstar Global Wide Moat ETF (MOTG) and AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF (EATZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MOTG	EATZ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.48	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.79	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.09	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.55	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.70	—	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	MOTG	EATZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-31.82%	—	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.56%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.31%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-24.29%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-8.17%	—	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.96%	—	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.02%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	MOTG	EATZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.87%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.61%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.16%	—	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.90%	—	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.83%	—	—

MOTG vs. EATZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

MOTG has a 0.52% expense ratio, which is lower than EATZ's 1.00% expense ratio.

Dividends

MOTG vs. EATZ - Dividend Comparison

MOTG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 18.27%, more than EATZ's 0.48% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
EATZ AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF	0.48%	0.50%	0.18%	0.49%	2.35%	0.15%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
MOTG VanEck Morningstar Global Wide Moat ETF	18.27%	17.75%	5.60%	1.86%	3.64%	5.88%	2.96%	3.91%	0.45%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MOTG and EATZ in my portfolio?

MOTG and EATZ have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, MOTG or EATZ?

On fees, MOTG is cheaper at 0.52% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, MOTG or EATZ?

MOTG is cheaper with a 0.52% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for EATZ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MOTG or EATZ?

MOTG has the higher dividend yield at 18.27%, compared with 0.48% for EATZ.

What is the main difference between MOTG and EATZ?

MOTG is categorized as Global Equities, while EATZ is Consumer Discretionary Equities. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and AdvisorShares. Their fees differ too: 0.52% for MOTG and 1.00% for EATZ.