MOTG vs. EATZ

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

MOTG (VanEck Morningstar Global Wide Moat ETF) and EATZ (AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MOTG is a Global Equities fund tracking the Morningstar Global Wide Moat Focus Index, while EATZ is a Consumer Discretionary Equities fund actively managed by AdvisorShares. MOTG is passively managed, while EATZ is actively managed. Their 0.63 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. MOTG charges 0.52%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for EATZ.

Performance

MOTG vs. EATZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Morningstar Global Wide Moat ETF (MOTG) and AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF (EATZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

MOTG

• 1D: 0.13%
• 1M: 4.10%
• 6M: 0.04%
• YTD: 3.60%
• 1Y: 11.45%
• 3Y*: 12.96%
• 5Y*: 7.23%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 11.62%

EATZ

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
MOTG VanEck Morningstar Global Wide Moat ETF	$12.56K	$25.37K	$44.36K

MOTG vs. EATZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
MOTG VanEck Morningstar Global Wide Moat ETF	3.60%	26.06%	9.31%	11.00%	-11.34%	4.54%
EATZ AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF	4.80%	-6.67%	23.21%	25.23%	-20.68%	-4.90%

Correlation

The correlation between MOTG and EATZ is 0.47, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.47
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.58
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.64
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 21, 2021	0.63

The correlation between MOTG and EATZ shifts across timeframes, from 0.47 (1 year) to 0.64 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

MOTG vs. EATZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	MOTG	EATZ
Industrials	25.3%	4.9%
Technology	18.8%	-
Consumer Defensive	17.7%	16.9%
Healthcare	16.0%	-
Consumer Cyclical	8.5%	78.2%
Financial Services	7.0%	-
Communication Services	5.6%	2.3%
Basic Materials	1.2%	-
Energy	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

MOTG vs. EATZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

MOTG

MOTG Risk / Return Rank: 29
MOTG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 30
MOTG Sortino Ratio Rank: 31
MOTG Omega Ratio Rank: 29
MOTG Calmar Ratio Rank: 26
MOTG Martin Ratio Rank: 28

EATZ

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

MOTG vs. EATZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Morningstar Global Wide Moat ETF (MOTG) and AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF (EATZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MOTG	EATZ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.75	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.15	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.14	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.84	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.39	—	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	MOTG	EATZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-31.82%	—	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.56%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.59%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-24.29%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.08%	—	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.97%	—	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.43%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	MOTG	EATZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.46%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.57%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.19%	—	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.90%	—	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.76%	—	—

MOTG vs. EATZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

MOTG has a 0.52% expense ratio, which is lower than EATZ's 1.00% expense ratio.

Dividends

MOTG vs. EATZ - Dividend Comparison

MOTG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 17.14%, more than EATZ's 0.48% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
EATZ AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF	0.48%	0.50%	0.18%	0.49%	2.35%	0.15%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
MOTG VanEck Morningstar Global Wide Moat ETF	17.14%	17.75%	5.60%	1.86%	3.64%	5.88%	2.96%	3.91%	0.45%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MOTG and EATZ in my portfolio?

MOTG and EATZ have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, MOTG or EATZ?

On fees, MOTG is cheaper at 0.52% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, MOTG or EATZ?

MOTG is cheaper with a 0.52% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for EATZ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MOTG or EATZ?

MOTG has the higher dividend yield at 17.14%, compared with 0.48% for EATZ.

What is the main difference between MOTG and EATZ?

MOTG is categorized as Global Equities, while EATZ is Consumer Discretionary Equities. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and AdvisorShares. Their fees differ too: 0.52% for MOTG and 1.00% for EATZ.