MOTG vs. ACWI
Compare and contrast key facts about VanEck Morningstar Global Wide Moat ETF (MOTG) and iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI).
MOTG and ACWI are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. MOTG is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the Morningstar Global Wide Moat Focus Index. It was launched on Oct 30, 2018. ACWI is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI All Country World Index. It was launched on Mar 26, 2008. Both MOTG and ACWI are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: MOTG or ACWI.
Performance
MOTG vs. ACWI - Performance Comparison
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MOTG achieves a 10.43% return, which is significantly lower than ACWI's 18.14% return.
MOTG
10.43%
-4.00%
4.25%
18.77%
8.55%
N/A
ACWI
18.14%
-1.18%
7.13%
25.19%
11.16%
9.22%
Key characteristics
| MOTG | ACWI | |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.68 | 2.23 |
| Sortino Ratio | 2.36 | 3.05 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.29 | 1.40 |
| Calmar Ratio | 1.82 | 3.18 |
| Martin Ratio | 9.29 | 14.28 |
| Ulcer Index | 2.11% | 1.80% |
| Daily Std Dev | 11.64% | 11.59% |
| Max Drawdown | -31.82% | -56.00% |
| Current Drawdown | -4.94% | -1.97% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MOTG vs. ACWI - Expense Ratio Comparison
MOTG has a 0.52% expense ratio, which is higher than ACWI's 0.32% expense ratio.
Correlation
The correlation between MOTG and ACWI is 0.93, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
MOTG vs. ACWI - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Morningstar Global Wide Moat ETF (MOTG) and iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
MOTG vs. ACWI - Dividend Comparison
MOTG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.68%, more than ACWI's 1.59% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MOTG VanEck Morningstar Global Wide Moat ETF | 1.68% | 1.86% | 3.64% | 5.88% | 2.96% | 2.35% | 0.45% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ACWI iShares MSCI ACWI ETF | 1.59% | 1.88% | 1.79% | 1.71% | 1.43% | 2.33% | 2.25% | 1.94% | 2.19% | 2.56% | 2.26% | 1.89% |
Drawdowns
MOTG vs. ACWI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MOTG drawdown since its inception was -31.82%, smaller than the maximum ACWI drawdown of -56.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MOTG and ACWI. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
MOTG vs. ACWI - Volatility Comparison
VanEck Morningstar Global Wide Moat ETF (MOTG) and iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI) have volatilities of 3.40% and 3.24%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.