PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
MOTG vs. ACWI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

MOTG vs. ACWI

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

MOTG (VanEck Morningstar Global Wide Moat ETF) and ACWI (iShares MSCI ACWI ETF) are both Global Equities funds - MOTG tracks the Morningstar Global Wide Moat Focus Index while ACWI tracks the MSCI All Country World Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, MOTG returned 6.29%/yr vs 11.34%/yr for ACWI. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. MOTG charges 0.52%/yr vs 0.32%/yr for ACWI.

Performance

MOTG vs. ACWI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Morningstar Global Wide Moat ETF (MOTG) and iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MOTG achieves a -2.17% return, which is significantly lower than ACWI's 12.10% return.

MOTG

1D
-0.76%
1M
-2.39%
YTD
-2.17%
6M
-2.15%
1Y
8.49%
3Y*
12.22%
5Y*
6.29%
10Y*
—

ACWI

1D
-0.10%
1M
1.68%
YTD
12.10%
6M
11.90%
1Y
29.31%
3Y*
20.81%
5Y*
11.34%
10Y*
13.32%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MOTG vs. ACWI - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
MOTG
VanEck Morningstar Global Wide Moat ETF		-2.17%26.06%9.31%11.00%-11.34%14.68%16.06%30.43%-3.89%
ACWI
iShares MSCI ACWI ETF		12.10%22.41%17.45%22.27%-18.39%18.66%16.34%26.59%-4.76%

Correlation

The correlation between MOTG and ACWI is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.85

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.86

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 31, 2018

0.92

The correlation between MOTG and ACWI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

MOTG vs. ACWI - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
MOTG
ACWI

Industrials

26.3%
10.3%

Technology

19.3%
33.0%

Consumer Defensive

16.8%
4.7%

Healthcare

14.1%
7.7%

Consumer Cyclical

9.5%
8.6%

Communication Services

6.6%
8.0%

Financial Services

6.3%
15.9%

Basic Materials

1.1%
3.6%

Energy

-

3.6%

Real Estate

-

1.6%

Utilities

-

2.7%

Industrials

MOTG
26.3%
ACWI
10.3%

Technology

MOTG
19.3%
ACWI
33.0%

Consumer Defensive

MOTG
16.8%
ACWI
4.7%

Healthcare

MOTG
14.1%
ACWI
7.7%

Consumer Cyclical

MOTG
9.5%
ACWI
8.6%

Communication Services

MOTG
6.6%
ACWI
8.0%

Financial Services

MOTG
6.3%
ACWI
15.9%

Basic Materials

MOTG
1.1%
ACWI
3.6%

Energy

MOTG

-

ACWI
3.6%

Real Estate

MOTG

-

ACWI
1.6%

Utilities

MOTG

-

ACWI
2.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

VanEck Morningstar Global Wide Moat ETF

iShares MSCI ACWI ETF

Often compared with MOTG:
MOTG vs. MOATMOTG vs. MOTIMOTG vs. GCOWMOTG vs. SPYMOTG vs. XDEB.DEMOTG vs. EATZMOTG vs. VEA
Often compared with ACWI:
ACWI vs. VTACWI vs. SPYACWI vs. VWRL.LACWI vs. ACWXACWI vs. ACWI.LACWI vs. VOOACWI vs. VTI

Return for Risk

MOTG vs. ACWI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
MOTG
MOTG Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
MOTG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MOTG Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
MOTG Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
MOTG Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
MOTG Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank
ACWI
ACWI Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
ACWI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ACWI Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
ACWI Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
ACWI Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
ACWI Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MOTG vs. ACWI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Morningstar Global Wide Moat ETF (MOTG) and iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

MOTGACWIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
0.60
2.18

-1.58

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
0.95
2.99

-2.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.40

-0.28

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.68

3.03

-2.35

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.13

13.22

-11.08

MOTG vs. ACWI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MOTG Sharpe Ratio is 0.60, which is lower than the ACWI Sharpe Ratio of 2.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MOTG and ACWI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MOTG vs. ACWI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MOTG drawdown since its inception was -31.82%, smaller than the maximum ACWI drawdown of -56.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MOTG and ACWI.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

MOTGACWIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.82%

-56.00%

+24.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.56%

-9.73%

-2.83%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.31%

-16.55%

+1.24%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.29%

-26.42%

+2.13%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

—

-33.53%

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.54%

-0.85%

-6.69%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.96%

-8.59%

+3.63%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.99%

2.22%

+1.77%

Volatility

MOTG vs. ACWI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for VanEck Morningstar Global Wide Moat ETF (MOTG) is 3.84%, while iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI) has a volatility of 5.16%. This indicates that MOTG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ACWI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

MOTGACWIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.84%

5.16%

-1.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.60%

11.20%

+0.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.17%

13.50%

+0.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.90%

16.17%

-0.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.84%

17.15%

+0.69%

MOTG vs. ACWI - Expense Ratio Comparison

MOTG has a 0.52% expense ratio, which is higher than ACWI's 0.32% expense ratio.

Dividends

MOTG vs. ACWI - Dividend Comparison

MOTG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 18.15%, more than ACWI's 1.42% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ACWI
iShares MSCI ACWI ETF		1.42%1.55%1.70%1.88%1.79%1.71%1.43%2.33%2.18%1.94%2.19%2.56%
MOTG
VanEck Morningstar Global Wide Moat ETF		18.15%17.75%5.60%1.86%3.64%5.88%2.96%3.91%0.45%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

MOTG and ACWI have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ACWI has higher volatility (5.16%) compared to MOTG (3.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MOTG dropped -31.82% vs ACWI's -56.00%.

On 5-year performance, ACWI leads with 11.34% vs 6.29% for MOTG. On fees, ACWI is cheaper at 0.32% per year. On volatility, MOTG has been the lower-risk option at 3.84%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, ACWI has performed better with a 11.34% return vs 6.29%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ACWI is cheaper with a 0.32% expense ratio, compared with 0.52% for MOTG.

MOTG has the higher dividend yield at 18.15%, compared with 1.42% for ACWI.

MOTG tracks Morningstar Global Wide Moat Focus Index, while ACWI tracks MSCI All Country World Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.52% for MOTG and 0.32% for ACWI.

ACWI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.18 vs 0.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MOTG and ACWI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer