MNVT vs. GXTG
MNVT (Moonvest ETF) and GXTG (Global X Thematic Growth ETF) are both Global Equities funds. MNVT is actively managed, while GXTG is passively managed. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MNVT charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for GXTG.
Performance
MNVT vs. GXTG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
MNVT
- 1D
- -2.85%
- 1M
- -6.54%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
GXTG
- 1D
- -2.97%
- 1M
- -11.25%
- 6M
- -9.15%
- YTD
- -2.22%
- 1Y
- -10.15%
- 3Y*
- -4.58%
- 5Y*
- -13.05%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -0.41%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $47.86K | $100.11K | $187.98K | |
MNVT Moonvest ETF | $653.57K | $816.73K | $1.17M |
MNVT vs. GXTG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
MNVT Moonvest ETF | 6.40% |
GXTG Global X Thematic Growth ETF | -0.50% |
Correlation
The correlation between MNVT and GXTG is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 18, 2026 | 0.75 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MNVT vs. GXTG — Risk / Return Rank
MNVT
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
GXTG
MNVT vs. GXTG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Moonvest ETF (MNVT) and Global X Thematic Growth ETF (GXTG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MNVT | GXTG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 0.97 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | -0.39 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | -0.81 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MNVT vs. GXTG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MNVT drawdown since its inception was -23.74%, smaller than the maximum GXTG drawdown of -67.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MNVT and GXTG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MNVT | GXTG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.74% | -67.81% | +44.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -24.98% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -29.58% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -61.17% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -23.74% | -61.35% | +37.61% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.51% | -43.36% | +34.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 12.04% | — |
Volatility
MNVT vs. GXTG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MNVT | GXTG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 10.71% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 24.23% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 45.29% | 30.22% | +15.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 45.29% | 28.50% | +16.79% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 45.29% | 29.98% | +15.31% |
MNVT vs. GXTG - Expense Ratio Comparison
MNVT has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than GXTG's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
MNVT vs. GXTG - Dividend Comparison
MNVT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GXTG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.53%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GXTG Global X Thematic Growth ETF | 1.53% | 1.40% | 1.08% | 1.99% | 1.48% | 1.56% | 0.48% | 0.31% |
MNVT Moonvest ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MNVT and GXTG have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GXTG is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GXTG is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for MNVT.
GXTG has the higher dividend yield at 1.53%, compared with 0.00% for MNVT.
They also come from different issuers: Moonvest and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for MNVT and 0.50% for GXTG.
Find the right allocation for MNVT and GXTG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer