MNVT vs. BDVL
MNVT (Moonvest ETF) and BDVL (iShares Disciplined Volatility Equity Active ETF) are both Global Equities funds. MNVT is actively managed, while BDVL is passively managed. A 0.52 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MNVT charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for BDVL.
Performance
MNVT vs. BDVL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
MNVT
- 1D
- -8.13%
- 1M
- 7.60%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BDVL
- 1D
- -1.52%
- 1M
- -2.05%
- YTD
- 3.52%
- 6M
- 3.81%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MNVT vs. BDVL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
MNVT Moonvest ETF | 23.95% |
BDVL iShares Disciplined Volatility Equity Active ETF | 3.79% |
Correlation
The correlation between MNVT and BDVL is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 19, 2026 | 0.52 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MNVT vs. BDVL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Moonvest ETF (MNVT) and iShares Disciplined Volatility Equity Active ETF (BDVL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MNVT | BDVL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 3.46 | 0.81 | +2.66 |
Drawdowns
MNVT vs. BDVL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MNVT drawdown since its inception was -12.56%, which is greater than BDVL's maximum drawdown of -7.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MNVT and BDVL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MNVT | BDVL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -12.56% | -7.71% | -4.85% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.18% | -2.08% | -10.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.52% | -1.19% | -2.33% |
Volatility
MNVT vs. BDVL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MNVT | BDVL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 48.76% | 9.62% | +39.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 48.76% | 9.62% | +39.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 48.76% | 9.62% | +39.14% |
MNVT vs. BDVL - Expense Ratio Comparison
MNVT has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than BDVL's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
MNVT vs. BDVL - Dividend Comparison
MNVT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BDVL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.70%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
BDVL iShares Disciplined Volatility Equity Active ETF | 2.70% | 2.79% |
MNVT Moonvest ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MNVT and BDVL have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BDVL is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BDVL is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for MNVT.
BDVL has the higher dividend yield at 2.70%, compared with 0.00% for MNVT.
They also come from different issuers: Moonvest and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for MNVT and 0.40% for BDVL.
Find the right allocation for MNVT and BDVL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer