MNVT vs. VXUS
MNVT (Moonvest ETF) and VXUS (Vanguard Total International Stock ETF) are both Global Equities funds. MNVT is actively managed, while VXUS is passively managed. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MNVT charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for VXUS.
Performance
MNVT vs. VXUS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
MNVT
- 1D
- -0.18%
- 1M
- -14.18%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VXUS
- 1D
- -1.12%
- 1M
- -1.62%
- YTD
- 12.67%
- 6M
- 12.67%
- 1Y
- 25.86%
- 3Y*
- 18.23%
- 5Y*
- 8.47%
- 10Y*
- 9.80%
MNVT vs. VXUS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
MNVT Moonvest ETF | 19.73% |
VXUS Vanguard Total International Stock ETF | 8.13% |
Correlation
The correlation between MNVT and VXUS is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 18, 2026 | 0.63 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MNVT vs. VXUS — Risk / Return Rank
MNVT
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
VXUS
MNVT vs. VXUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Moonvest ETF (MNVT) and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MNVT | VXUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.30 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.30 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 8.77 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MNVT vs. VXUS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MNVT drawdown since its inception was -18.41%, smaller than the maximum VXUS drawdown of -35.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MNVT and VXUS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MNVT | VXUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.41% | -35.97% | +17.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -11.27% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -13.58% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -29.44% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.97% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.18% | -2.91% | -11.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.06% | -8.19% | +2.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.96% | — |
Volatility
MNVT vs. VXUS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MNVT | VXUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 7.01% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 14.52% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 47.37% | 16.35% | +31.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 47.37% | 16.28% | +31.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 47.37% | 16.99% | +30.38% |
MNVT vs. VXUS - Expense Ratio Comparison
MNVT has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than VXUS's 0.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
MNVT vs. VXUS - Dividend Comparison
MNVT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VXUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.59%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MNVT Moonvest ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VXUS Vanguard Total International Stock ETF | 2.59% | 3.18% | 3.37% | 3.24% | 3.09% | 3.10% | 2.14% | 3.06% | 3.18% | 2.73% | 2.93% | 2.83% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MNVT and VXUS have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VXUS is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VXUS is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for MNVT.
VXUS has the higher dividend yield at 2.59%, compared with 0.00% for MNVT.
They also come from different issuers: Moonvest and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for MNVT and 0.05% for VXUS.
Find the right allocation for MNVT and VXUS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer