PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MNST vs. PAVE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MNST vs. PAVE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Monster Beverage Corporation (MNST) and Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF (PAVE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with MNST having a 21.08% return and PAVE slightly lower at 20.86%.


MNST

1D
0.87%
1M
8.17%
YTD
21.08%
6M
25.50%
1Y
47.21%
3Y*
16.85%
5Y*
14.70%
10Y*
13.79%

PAVE

1D
1.01%
1M
1.64%
YTD
20.86%
6M
18.50%
1Y
38.94%
3Y*
25.14%
5Y*
17.84%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MNST vs. PAVE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MNST
Monster Beverage Corporation
21.08%45.87%-8.77%13.48%5.72%3.85%45.52%29.11%-22.23%35.52%
PAVE
Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF
20.86%19.36%17.92%31.01%-7.17%36.42%19.72%33.26%-19.15%13.41%

Correlation

The correlation between MNST and PAVE is 0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.10

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.21

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.35

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 8, 2017

0.37

Over the past year, the correlation between MNST and PAVE has dropped to 0.10 - well below their long-term average of 0.37, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MNST vs. PAVE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MNST
MNST Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
MNST Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MNST Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
MNST Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
MNST Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
MNST Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

PAVE
PAVE Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
PAVE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PAVE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
PAVE Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
PAVE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
PAVE Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MNST vs. PAVE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Monster Beverage Corporation (MNST) and Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF (PAVE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MNSTPAVEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.16

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.32

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.60

3.11

-0.52

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.37

11.32

-3.95

MNST vs. PAVE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MNST Sharpe Ratio is 1.74, which is comparable to the PAVE Sharpe Ratio of 1.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MNST and PAVE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MNST vs. PAVE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MNST drawdown since its inception was -69.17%, which is greater than PAVE's maximum drawdown of -44.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MNST and PAVE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MNSTPAVEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-69.17%

-44.08%

-25.09%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.70%

-11.91%

-5.79%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.04%

-26.23%

+0.19%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.62%

-26.23%

-0.39%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.42%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.01%

+1.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.66%

-6.23%

-14.43%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.22%

3.27%

+2.95%

Volatility

MNST vs. PAVE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Monster Beverage Corporation (MNST) is 5.50%, while Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF (PAVE) has a volatility of 7.35%. This indicates that MNST experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PAVE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MNSTPAVEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.50%

7.35%

-1.85%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.03%

15.87%

+4.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.43%

19.49%

+6.94%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.60%

21.70%

+2.90%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.25%

24.40%

+1.85%

Dividends

MNST vs. PAVE - Dividend Comparison

MNST has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PAVE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.76%.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
MNST
Monster Beverage Corporation
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PAVE
Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF
0.76%0.92%0.54%0.68%0.84%0.48%0.44%0.67%0.78%0.30%

Frequently Asked Questions


MNST and PAVE have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PAVE has higher volatility (7.35%) compared to MNST (5.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MNST dropped -69.17% vs PAVE's -44.08%.

PAVE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.90 vs 1.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MNST and PAVE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer