MNHAX vs. EXHAX
Compare and contrast key facts about Manning & Napier High Yield Bond I (MNHAX) and Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Maximum Term Series (EXHAX).
MNHAX is managed by Manning & Napier. It was launched on Aug 1, 2012. EXHAX is managed by Manning & Napier. It was launched on Oct 31, 1995.
Performance
MNHAX vs. EXHAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
MNHAX vs. EXHAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MNHAX Manning & Napier High Yield Bond I | -1.05% | 6.90% | 9.29% | 13.49% | -7.38% | 10.27% | 6.58% | 14.25% | -0.98% | 8.68% |
EXHAX Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Maximum Term Series | -6.73% | 12.05% | 11.86% | 19.08% | -20.33% | 18.37% | 22.11% | 27.69% | -6.52% | 24.27% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MNHAX achieves a -1.05% return, which is significantly higher than EXHAX's -6.73% return. Over the past 10 years, MNHAX has underperformed EXHAX with an annualized return of 6.80%, while EXHAX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.28% annualized return.
MNHAX
- 1D
- 0.63%
- 1M
- -1.75%
- YTD
- -1.05%
- 6M
- 0.13%
- 1Y
- 4.72%
- 3Y*
- 8.65%
- 5Y*
- 5.44%
- 10Y*
- 6.80%
EXHAX
- 1D
- 2.93%
- 1M
- -6.51%
- YTD
- -6.73%
- 6M
- -3.31%
- 1Y
- 6.77%
- 3Y*
- 9.04%
- 5Y*
- 4.30%
- 10Y*
- 9.28%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MNHAX vs. EXHAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MNHAX has a 0.66% expense ratio, which is lower than EXHAX's 1.10% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
MNHAX vs. EXHAX — Risk / Return Rank
MNHAX
EXHAX
MNHAX vs. EXHAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Manning & Napier High Yield Bond I (MNHAX) and Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Maximum Term Series (EXHAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MNHAX | EXHAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.31 | 0.45 | +0.86 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.70 | 0.76 | +0.94 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.10 | +0.20 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.39 | 0.54 | +0.85 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.43 | 2.18 | +3.25 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MNHAX | EXHAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.31 | 0.45 | +0.86 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.38 | 0.30 | +0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.64 | 0.61 | +0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.66 | 0.41 | +0.25 |
Correlation
The correlation between MNHAX and EXHAX is 0.42, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
MNHAX vs. EXHAX - Dividend Comparison
MNHAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.60%, less than EXHAX's 11.39% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MNHAX Manning & Napier High Yield Bond I | 6.60% | 7.29% | 7.02% | 8.59% | 7.61% | 9.81% | 6.26% | 8.24% | 6.38% | 6.20% | 7.68% | 6.64% |
EXHAX Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Maximum Term Series | 11.39% | 10.62% | 6.41% | 2.13% | 10.95% | 6.01% | 3.28% | 5.21% | 10.32% | 7.83% | 2.08% | 1.27% |
Drawdowns
MNHAX vs. EXHAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MNHAX drawdown since its inception was -20.13%, smaller than the maximum EXHAX drawdown of -51.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MNHAX and EXHAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| MNHAX | EXHAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.13% | -51.96% | +31.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.40% | -13.33% | +9.93% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.13% | -27.63% | +7.50% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -20.13% | -29.53% | +9.40% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.52% | -10.52% | -3.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.41% | -8.88% | +5.47% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.87% | 3.29% | -2.42% |
Volatility
MNHAX vs. EXHAX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Manning & Napier High Yield Bond I (MNHAX) is 1.84%, while Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Maximum Term Series (EXHAX) has a volatility of 5.64%. This indicates that MNHAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EXHAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| MNHAX | EXHAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.84% | 5.64% | -3.80% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.29% | 9.42% | -7.13% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.79% | 16.01% | -12.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.41% | 14.42% | -0.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.69% | 15.24% | -4.55% |