EXHAX vs. EXBAX
Compare and contrast key facts about Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Maximum Term Series (EXHAX) and Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Moderate Term Series (EXBAX).
EXHAX is managed by Manning & Napier. It was launched on Oct 31, 1995. EXBAX is managed by Manning & Napier. It was launched on Sep 14, 1993.
Performance
EXHAX vs. EXBAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
EXHAX vs. EXBAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EXHAX Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Maximum Term Series | -9.38% | 12.05% | 11.86% | 19.08% | -20.33% | 18.37% | 22.11% | 27.69% | -6.52% | 24.27% |
EXBAX Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Moderate Term Series | -4.84% | 9.29% | 6.11% | 11.13% | -14.52% | 7.97% | 14.96% | 16.15% | -3.54% | 11.59% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EXHAX achieves a -9.38% return, which is significantly lower than EXBAX's -4.84% return. Over the past 10 years, EXHAX has outperformed EXBAX with an annualized return of 8.97%, while EXBAX has yielded a comparatively lower 5.08% annualized return.
EXHAX
- 1D
- 0.31%
- 1M
- -9.52%
- YTD
- -9.38%
- 6M
- -5.53%
- 1Y
- 4.08%
- 3Y*
- 8.00%
- 5Y*
- 3.98%
- 10Y*
- 8.97%
EXBAX
- 1D
- 0.44%
- 1M
- -5.88%
- YTD
- -4.84%
- 6M
- -2.61%
- 1Y
- 3.33%
- 3Y*
- 5.40%
- 5Y*
- 2.19%
- 10Y*
- 5.08%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
EXHAX vs. EXBAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
EXHAX has a 1.10% expense ratio, which is higher than EXBAX's 1.07% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
EXHAX vs. EXBAX — Risk / Return Rank
EXHAX
EXBAX
EXHAX vs. EXBAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Maximum Term Series (EXHAX) and Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Moderate Term Series (EXBAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EXHAX | EXBAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.26 | 0.43 | -0.17 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.49 | 0.66 | -0.17 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | 1.08 | -0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.19 | 0.38 | -0.19 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.80 | 1.69 | -0.90 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EXHAX | EXBAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.26 | 0.43 | -0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.28 | 0.29 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.59 | 0.67 | -0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.40 | 0.45 | -0.04 |
Correlation
The correlation between EXHAX and EXBAX is 0.94, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
EXHAX vs. EXBAX - Dividend Comparison
EXHAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.72%, more than EXBAX's 6.06% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EXHAX Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Maximum Term Series | 11.72% | 10.62% | 6.41% | 2.13% | 10.95% | 6.01% | 3.28% | 5.21% | 10.32% | 7.83% | 2.08% | 1.27% |
EXBAX Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Moderate Term Series | 6.06% | 5.77% | 4.57% | 2.27% | 0.99% | 6.67% | 6.31% | 4.83% | 5.08% | 6.09% | 1.81% | 0.58% |
Drawdowns
EXHAX vs. EXBAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EXHAX drawdown since its inception was -51.96%, which is greater than EXBAX's maximum drawdown of -29.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EXHAX and EXBAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| EXHAX | EXBAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -51.96% | -29.86% | -22.10% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.33% | -7.37% | -5.96% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.63% | -19.23% | -8.40% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -29.53% | -19.23% | -10.30% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.06% | -6.96% | -6.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.88% | -5.07% | -3.81% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.22% | 1.67% | +1.55% |
Volatility
EXHAX vs. EXBAX - Volatility Comparison
Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Maximum Term Series (EXHAX) has a higher volatility of 4.53% compared to Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Moderate Term Series (EXBAX) at 2.98%. This indicates that EXHAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EXBAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| EXHAX | EXBAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.53% | 2.98% | +1.55% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.98% | 5.03% | +3.95% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.78% | 7.91% | +7.87% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.36% | 7.50% | +6.86% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.22% | 7.60% | +7.62% |