EXHAX vs. EXCRX
Compare and contrast key facts about Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Maximum Term Series (EXHAX) and Manning & Napier Core Bond Series (EXCRX).
EXHAX is managed by Manning & Napier. It was launched on Oct 31, 1995. EXCRX is managed by Manning & Napier. It was launched on Apr 21, 2005.
Performance
EXHAX vs. EXCRX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
EXHAX vs. EXCRX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EXHAX Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Maximum Term Series | -6.73% | 12.05% | 11.86% | 19.08% | -20.33% | 18.37% | 22.11% | 27.69% | -6.52% | 24.27% |
EXCRX Manning & Napier Core Bond Series | -0.06% | 6.82% | 1.05% | 5.47% | -13.20% | -1.89% | 8.66% | 8.18% | -0.74% | 2.91% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EXHAX achieves a -6.73% return, which is significantly lower than EXCRX's -0.06% return. Over the past 10 years, EXHAX has outperformed EXCRX with an annualized return of 9.28%, while EXCRX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.58% annualized return.
EXHAX
- 1D
- 2.93%
- 1M
- -6.51%
- YTD
- -6.73%
- 6M
- -3.31%
- 1Y
- 6.77%
- 3Y*
- 9.04%
- 5Y*
- 4.30%
- 10Y*
- 9.28%
EXCRX
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- -1.55%
- YTD
- -0.06%
- 6M
- 0.53%
- 1Y
- 3.31%
- 3Y*
- 3.35%
- 5Y*
- -0.01%
- 10Y*
- 1.58%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
EXHAX vs. EXCRX - Expense Ratio Comparison
EXHAX has a 1.10% expense ratio, which is higher than EXCRX's 0.65% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
EXHAX vs. EXCRX — Risk / Return Rank
EXHAX
EXCRX
EXHAX vs. EXCRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Maximum Term Series (EXHAX) and Manning & Napier Core Bond Series (EXCRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EXHAX | EXCRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.45 | 0.85 | -0.40 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.76 | 1.22 | -0.47 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | 1.15 | -0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.54 | 1.29 | -0.75 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.18 | 3.59 | -1.41 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EXHAX | EXCRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.45 | 0.85 | -0.40 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.30 | -0.00 | +0.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.61 | 0.33 | +0.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.41 | 0.72 | -0.31 |
Correlation
The correlation between EXHAX and EXCRX is -0.04. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.
Dividends
EXHAX vs. EXCRX - Dividend Comparison
EXHAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.39%, more than EXCRX's 4.26% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EXHAX Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Maximum Term Series | 11.39% | 10.62% | 6.41% | 2.13% | 10.95% | 6.01% | 3.28% | 5.21% | 10.32% | 7.83% | 2.08% | 1.27% |
EXCRX Manning & Napier Core Bond Series | 4.26% | 4.18% | 3.82% | 3.64% | 2.23% | 2.28% | 5.15% | 2.01% | 2.32% | 1.94% | 2.14% | 2.45% |
Drawdowns
EXHAX vs. EXCRX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EXHAX drawdown since its inception was -51.96%, which is greater than EXCRX's maximum drawdown of -18.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EXHAX and EXCRX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| EXHAX | EXCRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -51.96% | -18.70% | -33.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.33% | -3.09% | -10.24% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.63% | -18.65% | -8.98% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -29.53% | -18.70% | -10.83% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.52% | -3.11% | -7.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.88% | -2.87% | -6.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.29% | 1.11% | +2.18% |
Volatility
EXHAX vs. EXCRX - Volatility Comparison
Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Maximum Term Series (EXHAX) has a higher volatility of 5.64% compared to Manning & Napier Core Bond Series (EXCRX) at 1.79%. This indicates that EXHAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EXCRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| EXHAX | EXCRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.64% | 1.79% | +3.85% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.42% | 2.73% | +6.69% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.01% | 4.60% | +11.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.42% | 5.87% | +8.55% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.24% | 4.83% | +10.41% |