EXHAX vs. MNBAX
Compare and contrast key facts about Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Maximum Term Series (EXHAX) and Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Extended Term Series (MNBAX).
EXHAX is managed by Manning & Napier. It was launched on Oct 31, 1995. MNBAX is managed by Manning & Napier. It was launched on Oct 11, 1993.
Performance
EXHAX vs. MNBAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
EXHAX vs. MNBAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EXHAX Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Maximum Term Series | -9.38% | 12.05% | 11.86% | 19.08% | -20.33% | 18.37% | 22.11% | 27.69% | -6.52% | 24.27% |
MNBAX Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Extended Term Series | -6.16% | 10.01% | 7.16% | 13.16% | -16.70% | 11.27% | 17.65% | 19.30% | -4.31% | 14.90% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EXHAX achieves a -9.38% return, which is significantly lower than MNBAX's -6.16% return. Over the past 10 years, EXHAX has outperformed MNBAX with an annualized return of 8.97%, while MNBAX has yielded a comparatively lower 6.19% annualized return.
EXHAX
- 1D
- 0.31%
- 1M
- -9.52%
- YTD
- -9.38%
- 6M
- -5.53%
- 1Y
- 4.08%
- 3Y*
- 8.00%
- 5Y*
- 3.98%
- 10Y*
- 8.97%
MNBAX
- 1D
- 0.39%
- 1M
- -6.99%
- YTD
- -6.16%
- 6M
- -3.55%
- 1Y
- 3.07%
- 3Y*
- 5.83%
- 5Y*
- 2.51%
- 10Y*
- 6.19%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
EXHAX vs. MNBAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
EXHAX has a 1.10% expense ratio, which is higher than MNBAX's 1.02% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
EXHAX vs. MNBAX — Risk / Return Rank
EXHAX
MNBAX
EXHAX vs. MNBAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Maximum Term Series (EXHAX) and Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Extended Term Series (MNBAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EXHAX | MNBAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.26 | 0.30 | -0.04 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.49 | 0.50 | -0.01 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | 1.06 | 0.00 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.19 | 0.25 | -0.05 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.80 | 1.05 | -0.25 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EXHAX | MNBAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.26 | 0.30 | -0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.28 | 0.27 | +0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.59 | 0.64 | -0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.40 | 0.45 | -0.05 |
Correlation
The correlation between EXHAX and MNBAX is 0.96, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
EXHAX vs. MNBAX - Dividend Comparison
EXHAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.72%, more than MNBAX's 10.81% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EXHAX Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Maximum Term Series | 11.72% | 10.62% | 6.41% | 2.13% | 10.95% | 6.01% | 3.28% | 5.21% | 10.32% | 7.83% | 2.08% | 1.27% |
MNBAX Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Extended Term Series | 10.81% | 10.14% | 4.23% | 1.81% | 3.68% | 5.12% | 6.49% | 4.49% | 5.73% | 6.53% | 1.15% | 2.05% |
Drawdowns
EXHAX vs. MNBAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EXHAX drawdown since its inception was -51.96%, which is greater than MNBAX's maximum drawdown of -39.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EXHAX and MNBAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| EXHAX | MNBAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -51.96% | -39.62% | -12.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.33% | -9.23% | -4.10% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.63% | -21.95% | -5.68% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -29.53% | -21.95% | -7.58% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.06% | -8.87% | -4.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.88% | -6.68% | -2.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.22% | 2.17% | +1.05% |
Volatility
EXHAX vs. MNBAX - Volatility Comparison
Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Maximum Term Series (EXHAX) has a higher volatility of 4.53% compared to Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Extended Term Series (MNBAX) at 3.40%. This indicates that EXHAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MNBAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| EXHAX | MNBAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.53% | 3.40% | +1.13% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.98% | 6.27% | +2.71% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.78% | 10.29% | +5.49% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.36% | 9.38% | +4.98% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.22% | 9.66% | +5.56% |