MNHAX vs. BGHSX
MNHAX (Manning & Napier High Yield Bond I) and BGHSX (BrandywineGLOBAL - High Yield Fund) are both High Yield Bonds funds. Over the past 3 years, MNHAX returned 9.16%/yr vs 7.85%/yr for BGHSX. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MNHAX charges 0.66%/yr vs 0.54%/yr for BGHSX.
Performance
MNHAX vs. BGHSX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MNHAX achieves a 2.27% return, which is significantly higher than BGHSX's -0.07% return.
MNHAX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.76%
- YTD
- 2.27%
- 6M
- 2.69%
- 1Y
- 7.23%
- 3Y*
- 9.16%
- 5Y*
- 5.52%
- 10Y*
- 6.78%
BGHSX
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- 0.43%
- YTD
- -0.07%
- 6M
- 0.61%
- 1Y
- 4.37%
- 3Y*
- 7.85%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MNHAX vs. BGHSX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MNHAX Manning & Napier High Yield Bond I | 2.27% | 6.90% | 9.29% | 13.49% | -7.38% | 3.14% |
BGHSX BrandywineGLOBAL - High Yield Fund | -0.07% | 5.55% | 9.90% | 13.21% | -10.23% | 1.12% |
Correlation
The correlation between MNHAX and BGHSX is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 4, 2021 | 0.77 |
The correlation between MNHAX and BGHSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MNHAX vs. BGHSX — Risk / Return Rank
MNHAX
BGHSX
MNHAX vs. BGHSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Manning & Napier High Yield Bond I (MNHAX) and BrandywineGLOBAL - High Yield Fund (BGHSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MNHAX | BGHSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.20 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.21 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.61 | 1.31 | +0.30 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.42 | 1.68 | +0.73 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.59 | 6.82 | +5.78 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MNHAX vs. BGHSX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MNHAX drawdown since its inception was -20.13%, which is greater than BGHSX's maximum drawdown of -14.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MNHAX and BGHSX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MNHAX | BGHSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.13% | -14.30% | -5.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.10% | -2.67% | -0.43% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.13% | -4.55% | -15.58% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.13% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -20.13% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.61% | -0.40% | -10.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.54% | -3.20% | -0.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.59% | 0.66% | -0.07% |
Volatility
MNHAX vs. BGHSX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Manning & Napier High Yield Bond I (MNHAX) is 0.62%, while BrandywineGLOBAL - High Yield Fund (BGHSX) has a volatility of 0.73%. This indicates that MNHAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BGHSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MNHAX | BGHSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.62% | 0.73% | -0.11% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.34% | 2.31% | +0.03% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.86% | 3.17% | -0.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.43% | 4.46% | +9.97% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.69% | 4.46% | +6.23% |
MNHAX vs. BGHSX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MNHAX has a 0.66% expense ratio, which is higher than BGHSX's 0.54% expense ratio.
Dividends
MNHAX vs. BGHSX - Dividend Comparison
MNHAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.35%, more than BGHSX's 6.27% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BGHSX BrandywineGLOBAL - High Yield Fund | 6.27% | 7.08% | 7.49% | 5.23% | 5.32% | 4.71% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MNHAX Manning & Napier High Yield Bond I | 6.35% | 7.29% | 7.02% | 8.59% | 7.61% | 9.81% | 6.26% | 8.24% | 6.38% | 6.20% | 7.68% | 6.64% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MNHAX and BGHSX have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BGHSX has higher volatility (0.73%) compared to MNHAX (0.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MNHAX dropped -20.13% vs BGHSX's -14.30%.
MNHAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.62 vs 1.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MNHAX and BGHSX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer