MNHAX vs. BGHSX

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

MNHAX (Manning & Napier High Yield Bond I) and BGHSX (BrandywineGLOBAL - High Yield Fund) are both High Yield Bonds funds. Over the past 3 years, MNHAX returned 8.52%/yr vs 6.94%/yr for BGHSX. Their 0.76 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. MNHAX charges 0.66%/yr vs 0.54%/yr for BGHSX.

Performance

MNHAX vs. BGHSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Manning & Napier High Yield Bond I (MNHAX) and BrandywineGLOBAL - High Yield Fund (BGHSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MNHAX achieves a 2.35% return, which is significantly higher than BGHSX's -0.26% return.

MNHAX

• 1D: -0.10%
• 1M: -0.12%
• 6M: 1.61%
• YTD: 2.35%
• 1Y: 5.97%
• 3Y*: 8.52%
• 5Y*: 5.35%
• 10Y*: 6.45%
• ALL TIME*: 6.21%

BGHSX

• 1D: -0.10%
• 1M: -0.80%
• 6M: -0.30%
• YTD: -0.26%
• 1Y: 2.87%
• 3Y*: 6.94%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 3.53%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
BGHSX BrandywineGLOBAL - High Yield Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
MNHAX Manning & Napier High Yield Bond I	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

MNHAX vs. BGHSX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
MNHAX Manning & Napier High Yield Bond I	2.35%	6.90%	9.29%	13.49%	-7.38%	3.14%
BGHSX BrandywineGLOBAL - High Yield Fund	-0.26%	5.55%	9.90%	13.21%	-10.23%	1.12%

Correlation

The correlation between MNHAX and BGHSX is 0.73, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.73
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.72
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 4, 2021	0.76

The correlation between MNHAX and BGHSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

MNHAX vs. BGHSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

MNHAX

MNHAX Risk / Return Rank: 75
MNHAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
MNHAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 80
MNHAX Omega Ratio Rank: 89
MNHAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 45
MNHAX Martin Ratio Rank: 77

BGHSX

BGHSX Risk / Return Rank: 23
BGHSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
BGHSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 26
BGHSX Omega Ratio Rank: 25
BGHSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 18
BGHSX Martin Ratio Rank: 25

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

MNHAX vs. BGHSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Manning & Napier High Yield Bond I (MNHAX) and BrandywineGLOBAL - High Yield Fund (BGHSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MNHAX	BGHSX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.06	0.84	+1.22
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.86	1.42	+1.44
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.46	1.18	+0.29
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.90	0.96	+0.94
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.85	3.86	+5.99

MNHAX vs. BGHSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MNHAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.06, which is higher than the BGHSX Sharpe Ratio of 0.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MNHAX and BGHSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

MNHAX vs. BGHSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MNHAX drawdown since its inception was -20.13%, which is greater than BGHSX's maximum drawdown of -14.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MNHAX and BGHSX.

Drawdown Indicators

	MNHAX	BGHSX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-20.13%	-14.30%	-5.83%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.10%	-2.67%	-0.43%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-20.13%	-4.55%	-15.58%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-20.13%	-14.30%	-5.83%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-20.13%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-10.54%	-0.80%	-9.74%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.59%	-3.14%	-0.45%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.60%	0.67%	-0.07%

Volatility

MNHAX vs. BGHSX - Volatility Comparison

Manning & Napier High Yield Bond I (MNHAX) has a higher volatility of 0.75% compared to BrandywineGLOBAL - High Yield Fund (BGHSX) at 0.57%. This indicates that MNHAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BGHSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MNHAX	BGHSX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.75%	0.57%	+0.18%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.41%	2.30%	+0.11%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.85%	3.12%	-0.27%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.42%	4.42%	+10.00%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	10.67%	4.42%	+6.25%

MNHAX vs. BGHSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MNHAX has a 0.66% expense ratio, which is higher than BGHSX's 0.54% expense ratio.

Dividends

MNHAX vs. BGHSX - Dividend Comparison

MNHAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.38%, more than BGHSX's 5.64% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BGHSX BrandywineGLOBAL - High Yield Fund	5.64%	7.08%	7.49%	5.23%	5.32%	4.71%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
MNHAX Manning & Napier High Yield Bond I	6.38%	7.29%	7.02%	8.59%	7.61%	9.81%	6.26%	8.24%	6.38%	6.20%	7.68%	6.64%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MNHAX and BGHSX in my portfolio?

MNHAX and BGHSX have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MNHAX or BGHSX?

MNHAX has higher volatility (0.75%) compared to BGHSX (0.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MNHAX dropped -20.13% vs BGHSX's -14.30%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MNHAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.06 vs 0.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.