PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
MNHAX vs. BGHSX
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between MNHAX and BGHSX is 0.64, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


-0.50.00.51.00.6

Performance

MNHAX vs. BGHSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Manning & Napier High Yield Bond I (MNHAX) and BrandywineGLOBAL - High Yield Fund (BGHSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

0.00%1.00%2.00%3.00%4.00%5.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
4.75%
5.04%
MNHAX
BGHSX

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

MNHAX:

3.73

BGHSX:

3.37

Sortino Ratio

MNHAX:

5.65

BGHSX:

6.07

Omega Ratio

MNHAX:

1.86

BGHSX:

1.87

Calmar Ratio

MNHAX:

4.05

BGHSX:

5.91

Martin Ratio

MNHAX:

28.37

BGHSX:

22.87

Ulcer Index

MNHAX:

0.35%

BGHSX:

0.46%

Daily Std Dev

MNHAX:

2.64%

BGHSX:

3.04%

Max Drawdown

MNHAX:

-19.76%

BGHSX:

-18.15%

Current Drawdown

MNHAX:

-0.00%

BGHSX:

-0.10%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MNHAX achieves a 1.23% return, which is significantly higher than BGHSX's 0.78% return. Over the past 10 years, MNHAX has outperformed BGHSX with an annualized return of 4.56%, while BGHSX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.65% annualized return.


MNHAX

YTD

1.23%

1M

1.12%

6M

4.75%

1Y

9.83%

5Y*

4.34%

10Y*

4.56%

BGHSX

YTD

0.78%

1M

0.68%

6M

5.04%

1Y

9.83%

5Y*

3.46%

10Y*

2.65%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


MNHAX vs. BGHSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MNHAX has a 0.66% expense ratio, which is higher than BGHSX's 0.54% expense ratio.


MNHAX
Manning & Napier High Yield Bond I
Expense ratio chart for MNHAX: current value at 0.66% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.66%
Expense ratio chart for BGHSX: current value at 0.54% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.54%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

MNHAX vs. BGHSX — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MNHAX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of MNHAX is 9696
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of MNHAX is 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of MNHAX is 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of MNHAX is 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of MNHAX is 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of MNHAX is 9797
Martin Ratio Rank

BGHSX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of BGHSX is 9696
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of BGHSX is 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of BGHSX is 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of BGHSX is 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of BGHSX is 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of BGHSX is 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

MNHAX vs. BGHSX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Manning & Napier High Yield Bond I (MNHAX) and BrandywineGLOBAL - High Yield Fund (BGHSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for MNHAX, currently valued at 3.73, compared to the broader market-1.000.001.002.003.004.003.733.37
The chart of Sortino ratio for MNHAX, currently valued at 5.65, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.005.656.07
The chart of Omega ratio for MNHAX, currently valued at 1.86, compared to the broader market1.002.003.004.001.861.87
The chart of Calmar ratio for MNHAX, currently valued at 4.05, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.004.055.91
The chart of Martin ratio for MNHAX, currently valued at 28.37, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.0028.3722.87
MNHAX
BGHSX

The current MNHAX Sharpe Ratio is 3.73, which is comparable to the BGHSX Sharpe Ratio of 3.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MNHAX and BGHSX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio3.003.504.004.505.005.50SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
3.73
3.37
MNHAX
BGHSX

Dividends

MNHAX vs. BGHSX - Dividend Comparison

MNHAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.46%, less than BGHSX's 6.71% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
MNHAX
Manning & Napier High Yield Bond I
6.46%6.69%6.91%5.88%4.65%5.04%6.64%5.14%5.00%6.19%5.35%4.72%
BGHSX
BrandywineGLOBAL - High Yield Fund
6.71%7.39%6.95%6.34%3.10%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

MNHAX vs. BGHSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MNHAX drawdown since its inception was -19.76%, which is greater than BGHSX's maximum drawdown of -18.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MNHAX and BGHSX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-1.20%-1.00%-0.80%-0.60%-0.40%-0.20%0.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
-0.00%
-0.10%
MNHAX
BGHSX

Volatility

MNHAX vs. BGHSX - Volatility Comparison

Manning & Napier High Yield Bond I (MNHAX) and BrandywineGLOBAL - High Yield Fund (BGHSX) have volatilities of 0.93% and 0.92%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


0.40%0.60%0.80%1.00%1.20%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
0.93%
0.92%
MNHAX
BGHSX
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab