MNHAX vs. ICMUX

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

MNHAX (Manning & Napier High Yield Bond I) and ICMUX (Intrepid Income Fund) are both mutual funds - MNHAX is a High Yield Bonds fund managed by Manning & Napier, while ICMUX is a Multisector Bonds fund managed by Intrepid Funds. Over the past 10 years, MNHAX returned 6.72%/yr vs 5.83%/yr for ICMUX. At a 0.48 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MNHAX charges 0.66%/yr vs 0.91%/yr for ICMUX.

Performance

MNHAX vs. ICMUX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Manning & Napier High Yield Bond I (MNHAX) and Intrepid Income Fund (ICMUX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with MNHAX having a 2.27% return and ICMUX slightly higher at 2.32%. Over the past 10 years, MNHAX has outperformed ICMUX with an annualized return of 6.72%, while ICMUX has yielded a comparatively lower 5.83% annualized return.

MNHAX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.76%
• YTD: 2.27%
• 6M: 2.69%
• 1Y: 7.45%
• 3Y*: 8.97%
• 5Y*: 5.57%
• 10Y*: 6.72%

ICMUX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.25%
• YTD: 2.32%
• 6M: 2.70%
• 1Y: 7.67%
• 3Y*: 9.67%
• 5Y*: 6.25%
• 10Y*: 5.83%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MNHAX vs. ICMUX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
MNHAX Manning & Napier High Yield Bond I	2.27%	6.90%	9.29%	13.49%	-7.38%	10.27%	6.58%	14.25%	-0.98%	8.68%
ICMUX Intrepid Income Fund	2.32%	8.16%	10.43%	10.90%	-3.17%	10.02%	8.77%	4.65%	0.53%	3.79%

Correlation

The correlation between MNHAX and ICMUX is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.70
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.65
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.61
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.50
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 2, 2012	0.48

Over the past year, MNHAX and ICMUX have become more correlated (0.70) than their long-term average of 0.48, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Return for Risk

MNHAX vs. ICMUX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MNHAX

MNHAX Risk / Return Rank: 78
MNHAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
MNHAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 87
MNHAX Omega Ratio Rank: 91
MNHAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 48
MNHAX Martin Ratio Rank: 74

ICMUX

ICMUX Risk / Return Rank: 97
ICMUX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
ICMUX Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
ICMUX Omega Ratio Rank: 98
ICMUX Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
ICMUX Martin Ratio Rank: 95

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MNHAX vs. ICMUX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Manning & Napier High Yield Bond I (MNHAX) and Intrepid Income Fund (ICMUX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MNHAX	ICMUX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.73	4.09	-1.37
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.87	6.83	-2.96
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.64	2.04	-0.41
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.52	5.92	-3.40
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.16	20.66	-7.50

MNHAX vs. ICMUX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MNHAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.73, which is lower than the ICMUX Sharpe Ratio of 4.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MNHAX and ICMUX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

MNHAX vs. ICMUX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MNHAX drawdown since its inception was -20.13%, which is greater than ICMUX's maximum drawdown of -8.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MNHAX and ICMUX.

Drawdown Indicators

	MNHAX	ICMUX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-20.13%	-8.77%	-11.36%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.10%	-1.34%	-1.76%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-20.13%	-3.11%	-17.02%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-20.13%	-5.64%	-14.49%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-20.13%	-8.77%	-11.36%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-10.61%	-0.11%	-10.50%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.54%	-0.74%	-2.80%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.59%	0.38%	+0.21%

Volatility

MNHAX vs. ICMUX - Volatility Comparison

Manning & Napier High Yield Bond I (MNHAX) has a higher volatility of 0.67% compared to Intrepid Income Fund (ICMUX) at 0.55%. This indicates that MNHAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ICMUX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MNHAX	ICMUX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.67%	0.55%	+0.12%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.34%	1.43%	+0.91%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.87%	1.94%	+0.93%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.42%	2.66%	+11.76%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	10.68%	2.58%	+8.10%

MNHAX vs. ICMUX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MNHAX has a 0.66% expense ratio, which is lower than ICMUX's 0.91% expense ratio.

Dividends

MNHAX vs. ICMUX - Dividend Comparison

MNHAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.35%, less than ICMUX's 7.55% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ICMUX Intrepid Income Fund	7.55%	7.96%	7.85%	9.10%	8.17%	5.99%	5.56%	3.35%	3.07%	2.86%	3.01%	3.53%
MNHAX Manning & Napier High Yield Bond I	6.35%	7.29%	7.02%	8.59%	7.61%	9.81%	6.26%	8.24%	6.38%	6.20%	7.68%	6.64%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MNHAX and ICMUX in my portfolio?

MNHAX and ICMUX have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MNHAX or ICMUX?

MNHAX has higher volatility (0.67%) compared to ICMUX (0.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MNHAX dropped -20.13% vs ICMUX's -8.77%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ICMUX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.09 vs 2.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.