EXHAX vs. VYM
Compare and contrast key facts about Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Maximum Term Series (EXHAX) and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM).
EXHAX is managed by Manning & Napier. It was launched on Oct 31, 1995. VYM is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the FTSE High Dividend Yield Index. It was launched on Feb 7, 2019.
Performance
EXHAX vs. VYM - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
EXHAX vs. VYM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EXHAX Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Maximum Term Series | -6.73% | 12.05% | 11.86% | 19.08% | -20.33% | 18.37% | 22.11% | 27.69% | -6.52% | 24.27% |
VYM Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF | 3.69% | 15.42% | 17.60% | 6.57% | -0.43% | 26.20% | 1.15% | 24.06% | -5.92% | 16.42% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EXHAX achieves a -6.73% return, which is significantly lower than VYM's 3.69% return. Over the past 10 years, EXHAX has underperformed VYM with an annualized return of 9.28%, while VYM has yielded a comparatively higher 11.22% annualized return.
EXHAX
- 1D
- 2.93%
- 1M
- -6.51%
- YTD
- -6.73%
- 6M
- -3.31%
- 1Y
- 6.77%
- 3Y*
- 9.04%
- 5Y*
- 4.30%
- 10Y*
- 9.28%
VYM
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- -4.02%
- YTD
- 3.69%
- 6M
- 6.19%
- 1Y
- 17.89%
- 3Y*
- 15.17%
- 5Y*
- 11.02%
- 10Y*
- 11.22%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
EXHAX vs. VYM - Expense Ratio Comparison
EXHAX has a 1.10% expense ratio, which is higher than VYM's 0.04% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
EXHAX vs. VYM — Risk / Return Rank
EXHAX
VYM
EXHAX vs. VYM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Maximum Term Series (EXHAX) and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EXHAX | VYM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.45 | 1.19 | -0.74 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.76 | 1.70 | -0.94 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | 1.26 | -0.16 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.54 | 1.56 | -1.02 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.18 | 6.86 | -4.68 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EXHAX | VYM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.45 | 1.19 | -0.74 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.30 | 0.79 | -0.49 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.61 | 0.69 | -0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.41 | 0.49 | -0.08 |
Correlation
The correlation between EXHAX and VYM is 0.84, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
EXHAX vs. VYM - Dividend Comparison
EXHAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.39%, more than VYM's 2.37% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EXHAX Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Maximum Term Series | 11.39% | 10.62% | 6.41% | 2.13% | 10.95% | 6.01% | 3.28% | 5.21% | 10.32% | 7.83% | 2.08% | 1.27% |
VYM Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF | 2.37% | 2.44% | 2.74% | 3.12% | 3.01% | 2.76% | 3.18% | 3.03% | 3.40% | 2.80% | 2.91% | 3.22% |
Drawdowns
EXHAX vs. VYM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EXHAX drawdown since its inception was -51.96%, smaller than the maximum VYM drawdown of -56.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EXHAX and VYM.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| EXHAX | VYM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -51.96% | -56.98% | +5.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.33% | -11.32% | -2.01% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.63% | -15.84% | -11.79% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -29.53% | -35.21% | +5.68% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.52% | -4.91% | -5.61% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.88% | -7.25% | -1.63% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.29% | 2.57% | +0.72% |
Volatility
EXHAX vs. VYM - Volatility Comparison
Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Maximum Term Series (EXHAX) has a higher volatility of 5.64% compared to Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) at 3.60%. This indicates that EXHAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VYM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| EXHAX | VYM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.64% | 3.60% | +2.04% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.42% | 7.96% | +1.46% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.01% | 15.14% | +0.87% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.42% | 13.97% | +0.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.24% | 16.33% | -1.09% |