MNBAX vs. PALDX
Compare and contrast key facts about Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Extended Term Series (MNBAX) and PGIM 60/40 Allocation Fund (PALDX).
MNBAX is managed by Manning & Napier. It was launched on Oct 11, 1993. PALDX is managed by PGIM. It was launched on Sep 12, 2017.
Performance
MNBAX vs. PALDX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
MNBAX vs. PALDX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MNBAX Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Extended Term Series | -6.16% | 10.01% | 7.16% | 13.16% | -16.70% | 11.27% | 17.65% | 19.30% | -4.31% | 1.65% |
PALDX PGIM 60/40 Allocation Fund | -3.62% | 13.62% | 18.96% | 18.90% | -15.65% | 16.30% | 10.68% | 22.27% | -4.12% | 5.95% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MNBAX achieves a -6.16% return, which is significantly lower than PALDX's -3.62% return.
MNBAX
- 1D
- 0.39%
- 1M
- -6.99%
- YTD
- -6.16%
- 6M
- -3.55%
- 1Y
- 3.07%
- 3Y*
- 5.83%
- 5Y*
- 2.51%
- 10Y*
- 6.19%
PALDX
- 1D
- -0.22%
- 1M
- -5.44%
- YTD
- -3.62%
- 6M
- -1.03%
- 1Y
- 12.43%
- 3Y*
- 13.72%
- 5Y*
- 7.99%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MNBAX vs. PALDX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MNBAX has a 1.02% expense ratio, which is higher than PALDX's 0.03% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
MNBAX vs. PALDX — Risk / Return Rank
MNBAX
PALDX
MNBAX vs. PALDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Extended Term Series (MNBAX) and PGIM 60/40 Allocation Fund (PALDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MNBAX | PALDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.30 | 1.12 | -0.82 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.50 | 1.65 | -1.16 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | 1.25 | -0.19 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.25 | 1.42 | -1.17 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.05 | 6.83 | -5.79 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MNBAX | PALDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.30 | 1.12 | -0.82 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.27 | 0.67 | -0.40 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.64 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.45 | 0.71 | -0.26 |
Correlation
The correlation between MNBAX and PALDX is 0.88, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
MNBAX vs. PALDX - Dividend Comparison
MNBAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.81%, more than PALDX's 5.62% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MNBAX Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Extended Term Series | 10.81% | 10.14% | 4.23% | 1.81% | 3.68% | 5.12% | 6.49% | 4.49% | 5.73% | 6.53% | 1.15% | 2.05% |
PALDX PGIM 60/40 Allocation Fund | 5.62% | 5.42% | 10.40% | 2.94% | 6.19% | 6.87% | 2.58% | 4.58% | 3.65% | 1.48% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
MNBAX vs. PALDX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MNBAX drawdown since its inception was -39.62%, which is greater than PALDX's maximum drawdown of -26.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MNBAX and PALDX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| MNBAX | PALDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.62% | -26.16% | -13.46% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.23% | -8.20% | -1.03% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.95% | -20.47% | -1.48% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -21.95% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.87% | -5.96% | -2.91% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.68% | -4.16% | -2.52% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.17% | 1.70% | +0.47% |
Volatility
MNBAX vs. PALDX - Volatility Comparison
Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Extended Term Series (MNBAX) has a higher volatility of 3.40% compared to PGIM 60/40 Allocation Fund (PALDX) at 3.05%. This indicates that MNBAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PALDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| MNBAX | PALDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.40% | 3.05% | +0.35% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.27% | 5.86% | +0.41% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.29% | 11.52% | -1.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.38% | 12.08% | -2.70% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.66% | 12.75% | -3.09% |