MNBAX vs. EXCRX
Compare and contrast key facts about Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Extended Term Series (MNBAX) and Manning & Napier Core Bond Series (EXCRX).
MNBAX is managed by Manning & Napier. It was launched on Oct 11, 1993. EXCRX is managed by Manning & Napier. It was launched on Apr 21, 2005.
Performance
MNBAX vs. EXCRX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
MNBAX vs. EXCRX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MNBAX Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Extended Term Series | -6.16% | 10.01% | 7.16% | 13.16% | -16.70% | 11.27% | 17.65% | 19.30% | -4.31% | 14.90% |
EXCRX Manning & Napier Core Bond Series | -0.17% | 6.82% | 1.05% | 5.47% | -13.20% | -1.89% | 8.66% | 8.18% | -0.74% | 2.91% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MNBAX achieves a -6.16% return, which is significantly lower than EXCRX's -0.17% return. Over the past 10 years, MNBAX has outperformed EXCRX with an annualized return of 6.19%, while EXCRX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.57% annualized return.
MNBAX
- 1D
- 0.39%
- 1M
- -6.99%
- YTD
- -6.16%
- 6M
- -3.55%
- 1Y
- 3.07%
- 3Y*
- 5.83%
- 5Y*
- 2.51%
- 10Y*
- 6.19%
EXCRX
- 1D
- 0.66%
- 1M
- -2.07%
- YTD
- -0.17%
- 6M
- 0.64%
- 1Y
- 3.76%
- 3Y*
- 3.31%
- 5Y*
- 0.06%
- 10Y*
- 1.57%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MNBAX vs. EXCRX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MNBAX has a 1.02% expense ratio, which is higher than EXCRX's 0.65% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
MNBAX vs. EXCRX — Risk / Return Rank
MNBAX
EXCRX
MNBAX vs. EXCRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Extended Term Series (MNBAX) and Manning & Napier Core Bond Series (EXCRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MNBAX | EXCRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.30 | 0.84 | -0.54 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.50 | 1.22 | -0.73 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | 1.15 | -0.09 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.25 | 1.47 | -1.22 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.05 | 4.13 | -3.08 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MNBAX | EXCRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.30 | 0.84 | -0.54 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.27 | 0.01 | +0.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.64 | 0.33 | +0.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.45 | 0.72 | -0.26 |
Correlation
The correlation between MNBAX and EXCRX is 0.09, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
MNBAX vs. EXCRX - Dividend Comparison
MNBAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.81%, more than EXCRX's 4.26% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MNBAX Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Extended Term Series | 10.81% | 10.14% | 4.23% | 1.81% | 3.68% | 5.12% | 6.49% | 4.49% | 5.73% | 6.53% | 1.15% | 2.05% |
EXCRX Manning & Napier Core Bond Series | 4.26% | 4.18% | 3.82% | 3.64% | 2.23% | 2.28% | 5.15% | 2.01% | 2.32% | 1.94% | 2.14% | 2.45% |
Drawdowns
MNBAX vs. EXCRX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MNBAX drawdown since its inception was -39.62%, which is greater than EXCRX's maximum drawdown of -18.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MNBAX and EXCRX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| MNBAX | EXCRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.62% | -18.70% | -20.92% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.23% | -3.09% | -6.14% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.95% | -18.65% | -3.30% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -21.95% | -18.70% | -3.25% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.87% | -3.21% | -5.66% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.68% | -2.87% | -3.81% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.17% | 1.10% | +1.07% |
Volatility
MNBAX vs. EXCRX - Volatility Comparison
Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Extended Term Series (MNBAX) has a higher volatility of 3.40% compared to Manning & Napier Core Bond Series (EXCRX) at 1.81%. This indicates that MNBAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EXCRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| MNBAX | EXCRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.40% | 1.81% | +1.59% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.27% | 2.73% | +3.54% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.29% | 4.61% | +5.68% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.38% | 5.87% | +3.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.66% | 4.83% | +4.83% |