MNBAX vs. EXDVX
Compare and contrast key facts about Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Extended Term Series (MNBAX) and Manning & Napier Divrs Tax Exempt Series Fund (EXDVX).
MNBAX is managed by Manning & Napier. It was launched on Oct 11, 1993. EXDVX is managed by Manning & Napier. It was launched on Feb 13, 1994.
Performance
MNBAX vs. EXDVX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
MNBAX vs. EXDVX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MNBAX Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Extended Term Series | -6.16% | 10.01% | 7.16% | 13.16% | -16.70% | 11.27% | 17.65% | 19.30% | -4.31% | 14.90% |
EXDVX Manning & Napier Divrs Tax Exempt Series Fund | -0.69% | 4.30% | 0.41% | 4.10% | -5.83% | 0.16% | 5.73% | 5.10% | 0.65% | 2.37% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MNBAX achieves a -6.16% return, which is significantly lower than EXDVX's -0.69% return. Over the past 10 years, MNBAX has outperformed EXDVX with an annualized return of 6.19%, while EXDVX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.40% annualized return.
MNBAX
- 1D
- 0.39%
- 1M
- -6.99%
- YTD
- -6.16%
- 6M
- -3.55%
- 1Y
- 3.07%
- 3Y*
- 5.83%
- 5Y*
- 2.51%
- 10Y*
- 6.19%
EXDVX
- 1D
- 0.19%
- 1M
- -2.25%
- YTD
- -0.69%
- 6M
- 0.60%
- 1Y
- 3.40%
- 3Y*
- 2.10%
- 5Y*
- 0.55%
- 10Y*
- 1.40%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MNBAX vs. EXDVX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MNBAX has a 1.02% expense ratio, which is higher than EXDVX's 0.63% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
MNBAX vs. EXDVX — Risk / Return Rank
MNBAX
EXDVX
MNBAX vs. EXDVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Extended Term Series (MNBAX) and Manning & Napier Divrs Tax Exempt Series Fund (EXDVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MNBAX | EXDVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.30 | 1.02 | -0.72 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.50 | 1.38 | -0.88 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | 1.34 | -0.28 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.25 | 1.07 | -0.82 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.05 | 4.54 | -3.49 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MNBAX | EXDVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.30 | 1.02 | -0.72 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.27 | 0.21 | +0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.64 | 0.47 | +0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.45 | 0.55 | -0.10 |
Correlation
The correlation between MNBAX and EXDVX is 0.10, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
MNBAX vs. EXDVX - Dividend Comparison
MNBAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.81%, more than EXDVX's 2.18% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MNBAX Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Extended Term Series | 10.81% | 10.14% | 4.23% | 1.81% | 3.68% | 5.12% | 6.49% | 4.49% | 5.73% | 6.53% | 1.15% | 2.05% |
EXDVX Manning & Napier Divrs Tax Exempt Series Fund | 2.18% | 2.26% | 1.87% | 1.67% | 0.61% | 6.02% | 1.69% | 2.81% | 1.38% | 1.25% | 1.10% | 0.86% |
Drawdowns
MNBAX vs. EXDVX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MNBAX drawdown since its inception was -39.62%, which is greater than EXDVX's maximum drawdown of -12.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MNBAX and EXDVX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| MNBAX | EXDVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.62% | -12.74% | -26.88% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.23% | -3.55% | -5.68% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.95% | -9.29% | -12.66% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -21.95% | -9.29% | -12.66% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.87% | -2.25% | -6.62% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.68% | -2.19% | -4.49% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.17% | 0.84% | +1.33% |
Volatility
MNBAX vs. EXDVX - Volatility Comparison
Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Extended Term Series (MNBAX) has a higher volatility of 3.40% compared to Manning & Napier Divrs Tax Exempt Series Fund (EXDVX) at 0.78%. This indicates that MNBAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EXDVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| MNBAX | EXDVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.40% | 0.78% | +2.62% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.27% | 1.16% | +5.11% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.29% | 3.66% | +6.63% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.38% | 2.68% | +6.70% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.66% | 2.96% | +6.70% |