PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MMDAX vs. MINVX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MMDAX vs. MINVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Madison Moderate Allocation Fund (MMDAX) and Madison Investors Fund (MINVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MMDAX achieves a 8.81% return, which is significantly higher than MINVX's 5.21% return. Over the past 10 years, MMDAX has underperformed MINVX with an annualized return of 6.40%, while MINVX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.56% annualized return.


MMDAX

1D
0.33%
1M
4.09%
YTD
8.81%
6M
9.30%
1Y
17.63%
3Y*
11.10%
5Y*
4.53%
10Y*
6.40%

MINVX

1D
0.07%
1M
-0.71%
YTD
5.21%
6M
4.59%
1Y
8.17%
3Y*
13.26%
5Y*
8.96%
10Y*
12.56%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MMDAX vs. MINVX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MMDAX
Madison Moderate Allocation Fund
8.81%11.13%6.97%10.32%-14.49%6.79%9.77%15.99%-4.80%14.29%
MINVX
Madison Investors Fund
5.21%3.30%16.38%26.12%-13.18%22.70%14.48%30.48%0.64%22.53%

Correlation

The correlation between MMDAX and MINVX is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.82

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.85

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 5, 2006

0.90

The correlation between MMDAX and MINVX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MMDAX vs. MINVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MMDAX
MMDAX Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
MMDAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MMDAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
MMDAX Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
MMDAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
MMDAX Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank

MINVX
MINVX Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
MINVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MINVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
MINVX Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
MINVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
MINVX Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MMDAX vs. MINVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Madison Moderate Allocation Fund (MMDAX) and Madison Investors Fund (MINVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MMDAXMINVXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.42

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.97

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.13

+0.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.57

0.95

+1.62

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.93

2.86

+8.07

MMDAX vs. MINVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MMDAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.13, which is higher than the MINVX Sharpe Ratio of 0.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MMDAX and MINVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MMDAXMINVXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.13

0.71

+1.42

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

0.55

-0.13

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.60

0.74

-0.14

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.43

0.36

+0.08

Drawdowns

MMDAX vs. MINVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MMDAX drawdown since its inception was -43.12%, smaller than the maximum MINVX drawdown of -52.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MMDAX and MINVX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MMDAXMINVXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.12%

-52.40%

+9.28%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.05%

-10.00%

+2.95%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.02%

-16.23%

+6.21%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.36%

-21.46%

-3.90%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.36%

-33.85%

+8.49%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.80%

+1.80%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.37%

-7.57%

+0.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.66%

3.31%

-1.65%

Volatility

MMDAX vs. MINVX - Volatility Comparison

Madison Moderate Allocation Fund (MMDAX) has a higher volatility of 2.87% compared to Madison Investors Fund (MINVX) at 2.49%. This indicates that MMDAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MINVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MMDAXMINVXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.87%

2.49%

+0.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.02%

9.71%

-2.69%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.51%

13.31%

-4.80%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.75%

16.29%

-5.54%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.70%

17.02%

-6.32%

MMDAX vs. MINVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MMDAX has a 0.71% expense ratio, which is lower than MINVX's 0.91% expense ratio.


Dividends

MMDAX vs. MINVX - Dividend Comparison

MMDAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.63%, less than MINVX's 6.93% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MINVX
Madison Investors Fund
6.93%7.30%6.09%8.18%6.64%7.82%9.86%6.02%18.77%5.91%3.31%16.40%
MMDAX
Madison Moderate Allocation Fund
5.63%6.12%3.70%2.15%1.39%8.46%9.24%3.95%9.05%5.13%4.36%7.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


MMDAX and MINVX have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MMDAX has higher volatility (2.87%) compared to MINVX (2.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MMDAX dropped -43.12% vs MINVX's -52.40%.

MMDAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.13 vs 0.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MMDAX and MINVX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer