MINVX vs. AMAGX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

MINVX (Madison Investors Fund) and AMAGX (Amana Mutual Funds Trust Growth Fund) are both mutual funds - MINVX is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund managed by Madison Funds, while AMAGX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Amana. Over the past 10 years, MINVX returned 12.56%/yr vs 17.72%/yr for AMAGX. Their correlation of 0.80 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.91% expense ratio.

Performance

MINVX vs. AMAGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Madison Investors Fund (MINVX) and Amana Mutual Funds Trust Growth Fund (AMAGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MINVX achieves a 5.21% return, which is significantly lower than AMAGX's 17.40% return. Over the past 10 years, MINVX has underperformed AMAGX with an annualized return of 12.56%, while AMAGX has yielded a comparatively higher 17.72% annualized return.

MINVX

• 1D: 0.07%
• 1M: -0.71%
• YTD: 5.21%
• 6M: 4.59%
• 1Y: 8.17%
• 3Y*: 13.26%
• 5Y*: 8.96%
• 10Y*: 12.56%

AMAGX

• 1D: 0.94%
• 1M: 7.90%
• YTD: 17.40%
• 6M: 15.83%
• 1Y: 37.60%
• 3Y*: 21.85%
• 5Y*: 14.44%
• 10Y*: 17.72%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MINVX vs. AMAGX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
MINVX Madison Investors Fund	5.21%	3.30%	16.38%	26.12%	-13.18%	22.70%	14.48%	30.48%	0.64%	22.53%
AMAGX Amana Mutual Funds Trust Growth Fund	17.40%	17.62%	15.73%	25.67%	-19.49%	31.51%	32.93%	33.09%	2.47%	28.91%

Correlation

The correlation between MINVX and AMAGX is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.58
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.70
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.80
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.82
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 4, 1994	0.80

Over the past year, the correlation between MINVX and AMAGX has dropped to 0.58 - well below their long-term average of 0.80, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

MINVX vs. AMAGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MINVX

MINVX Risk / Return Rank: 9
MINVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9
MINVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9
MINVX Omega Ratio Rank: 9
MINVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 10
MINVX Martin Ratio Rank: 10

AMAGX

AMAGX Risk / Return Rank: 69
AMAGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 68
AMAGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
AMAGX Omega Ratio Rank: 57
AMAGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
AMAGX Martin Ratio Rank: 83

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MINVX vs. AMAGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Madison Investors Fund (MINVX) and Amana Mutual Funds Trust Growth Fund (AMAGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MINVX	AMAGX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.71	2.40	-1.69
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.12	3.29	-2.16
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.13	1.42	-0.28
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.95	3.50	-2.55
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	2.86	15.59	-12.73
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MINVX vs. AMAGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MINVX Sharpe Ratio is 0.71, which is lower than the AMAGX Sharpe Ratio of 2.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MINVX and AMAGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MINVX	AMAGX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.71	2.40	-1.69
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.55	0.79	-0.24
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.74	0.97	-0.22
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.36	0.68	-0.33

Drawdowns

MINVX vs. AMAGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MINVX drawdown since its inception was -52.40%, smaller than the maximum AMAGX drawdown of -57.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MINVX and AMAGX.

Drawdown Indicators

	MINVX	AMAGX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-52.40%	-57.64%	+5.24%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.00%	-11.04%	+1.04%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.23%	-21.45%	+5.22%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-21.46%	-28.09%	+6.63%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-33.85%	-28.09%	-5.76%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.80%	0.00%	-1.80%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.57%	-10.27%	+2.70%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.31%	2.48%	+0.83%

Volatility

MINVX vs. AMAGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Madison Investors Fund (MINVX) is 2.49%, while Amana Mutual Funds Trust Growth Fund (AMAGX) has a volatility of 4.98%. This indicates that MINVX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AMAGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MINVX	AMAGX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.49%	4.98%	-2.49%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.71%	12.96%	-3.25%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.31%	16.09%	-2.78%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.29%	18.40%	-2.11%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.02%	18.43%	-1.41%

MINVX vs. AMAGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both MINVX and AMAGX have an expense ratio of 0.91%.

Dividends

MINVX vs. AMAGX - Dividend Comparison

MINVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.93%, while AMAGX has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
AMAGX Amana Mutual Funds Trust Growth Fund	0.00%	0.00%	3.95%	0.65%	3.64%	0.52%	5.44%	3.15%	3.47%	10.90%	13.67%	7.45%
MINVX Madison Investors Fund	6.93%	7.30%	6.09%	8.18%	6.64%	7.82%	9.86%	6.02%	18.77%	5.91%	3.31%	16.40%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MINVX and AMAGX in my portfolio?

MINVX and AMAGX have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MINVX or AMAGX?

AMAGX has higher volatility (4.98%) compared to MINVX (2.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MINVX dropped -52.40% vs AMAGX's -57.64%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AMAGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.40 vs 0.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.