PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MINVX vs. GTSGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MINVX vs. GTSGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Madison Investors Fund (MINVX) and Madison Mid Cap Fund (GTSGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MINVX achieves a 5.21% return, which is significantly higher than GTSGX's -1.68% return. Over the past 10 years, MINVX has outperformed GTSGX with an annualized return of 12.56%, while GTSGX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.41% annualized return.


MINVX

1D
0.07%
1M
-0.71%
YTD
5.21%
6M
4.59%
1Y
8.17%
3Y*
13.26%
5Y*
8.96%
10Y*
12.56%

GTSGX

1D
-0.38%
1M
1.74%
YTD
-1.68%
6M
-1.41%
1Y
-0.33%
3Y*
9.74%
5Y*
6.54%
10Y*
10.41%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MINVX vs. GTSGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MINVX
Madison Investors Fund
5.21%3.30%16.38%26.12%-13.18%22.70%14.48%30.48%0.64%22.53%
GTSGX
Madison Mid Cap Fund
-1.68%1.62%10.24%26.51%-13.60%26.31%9.45%33.53%-1.60%15.65%

Correlation

The correlation between MINVX and GTSGX is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.84

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.89

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 1990

0.84

The correlation between MINVX and GTSGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MINVX vs. GTSGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MINVX
MINVX Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
MINVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MINVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
MINVX Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
MINVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
MINVX Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank

GTSGX
GTSGX Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
GTSGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GTSGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
GTSGX Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
GTSGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
GTSGX Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MINVX vs. GTSGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Madison Investors Fund (MINVX) and Madison Mid Cap Fund (GTSGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MINVXGTSGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.65

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.92

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.02

+0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.95

0.08

+0.87

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.86

0.19

+2.67

MINVX vs. GTSGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MINVX Sharpe Ratio is 0.71, which is higher than the GTSGX Sharpe Ratio of 0.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MINVX and GTSGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MINVXGTSGXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.71

0.06

+0.65

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

0.38

+0.18

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.74

0.58

+0.16

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.36

0.15

+0.21

Drawdowns

MINVX vs. GTSGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MINVX drawdown since its inception was -52.40%, smaller than the maximum GTSGX drawdown of -73.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MINVX and GTSGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MINVXGTSGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-52.40%

-73.82%

+21.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.00%

-11.99%

+1.99%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.23%

-19.63%

+3.40%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.46%

-21.94%

+0.48%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.85%

-38.25%

+4.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.80%

-7.49%

+5.69%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.57%

-29.69%

+22.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.31%

4.83%

-1.52%

Volatility

MINVX vs. GTSGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Madison Investors Fund (MINVX) is 2.49%, while Madison Mid Cap Fund (GTSGX) has a volatility of 4.05%. This indicates that MINVX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GTSGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MINVXGTSGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.49%

4.05%

-1.56%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.71%

10.12%

-0.41%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.31%

14.70%

-1.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.29%

17.43%

-1.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.02%

18.07%

-1.05%

MINVX vs. GTSGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MINVX has a 0.91% expense ratio, which is lower than GTSGX's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

MINVX vs. GTSGX - Dividend Comparison

MINVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.93%, more than GTSGX's 3.43% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GTSGX
Madison Mid Cap Fund
3.43%3.37%5.76%1.25%1.96%4.38%3.43%3.74%7.57%3.58%4.34%6.09%
MINVX
Madison Investors Fund
6.93%7.30%6.09%8.18%6.64%7.82%9.86%6.02%18.77%5.91%3.31%16.40%

Frequently Asked Questions


MINVX and GTSGX have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GTSGX has higher volatility (4.05%) compared to MINVX (2.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MINVX dropped -52.40% vs GTSGX's -73.82%.

MINVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.71 vs 0.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MINVX and GTSGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer