PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MMDAX vs. MBLAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MMDAX vs. MBLAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Madison Moderate Allocation Fund (MMDAX) and Madison Diversified Income Fund (MBLAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MMDAX achieves a 8.81% return, which is significantly higher than MBLAX's 3.79% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with MMDAX having a 6.40% annualized return and MBLAX not far ahead at 6.53%.


MMDAX

1D
0.33%
1M
4.09%
YTD
8.81%
6M
9.30%
1Y
17.63%
3Y*
11.10%
5Y*
4.53%
10Y*
6.40%

MBLAX

1D
0.23%
1M
0.44%
YTD
3.79%
6M
3.67%
1Y
8.60%
3Y*
7.23%
5Y*
2.93%
10Y*
6.53%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MMDAX vs. MBLAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MMDAX
Madison Moderate Allocation Fund
8.81%11.13%6.97%10.32%-14.49%6.79%9.77%15.99%-4.80%14.29%
MBLAX
Madison Diversified Income Fund
3.79%6.70%4.80%3.38%-7.99%14.42%7.57%19.28%-1.22%12.84%

Correlation

The correlation between MMDAX and MBLAX is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.76

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.83

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 5, 2006

0.87

The correlation between MMDAX and MBLAX shifts across timeframes, from 0.76 (1 year) to 0.87 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MMDAX vs. MBLAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MMDAX
MMDAX Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
MMDAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MMDAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
MMDAX Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
MMDAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
MMDAX Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank

MBLAX
MBLAX Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
MBLAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MBLAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
MBLAX Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
MBLAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
MBLAX Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MMDAX vs. MBLAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Madison Moderate Allocation Fund (MMDAX) and Madison Diversified Income Fund (MBLAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MMDAXMBLAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.20

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.23

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.36

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.57

2.65

-0.08

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.93

9.36

+1.57

MMDAX vs. MBLAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MMDAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.13, which is comparable to the MBLAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MMDAX and MBLAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MMDAXMBLAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.13

1.93

+0.20

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

0.28

+0.14

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.60

0.60

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.43

0.59

-0.15

Drawdowns

MMDAX vs. MBLAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MMDAX drawdown since its inception was -43.12%, which is greater than MBLAX's maximum drawdown of -26.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MMDAX and MBLAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MMDAXMBLAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.12%

-26.64%

-16.48%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.05%

-3.42%

-3.63%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.02%

-7.37%

-2.65%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.36%

-23.81%

-1.55%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.36%

-23.81%

-1.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.74%

+0.74%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.37%

-4.75%

-2.62%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.66%

0.97%

+0.69%

Volatility

MMDAX vs. MBLAX - Volatility Comparison

Madison Moderate Allocation Fund (MMDAX) has a higher volatility of 2.87% compared to Madison Diversified Income Fund (MBLAX) at 1.14%. This indicates that MMDAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MBLAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MMDAXMBLAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.87%

1.14%

+1.73%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.02%

3.44%

+3.58%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.51%

4.69%

+3.82%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.75%

10.56%

+0.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.70%

10.94%

-0.24%

MMDAX vs. MBLAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MMDAX has a 0.71% expense ratio, which is lower than MBLAX's 1.11% expense ratio.


Dividends

MMDAX vs. MBLAX - Dividend Comparison

MMDAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.63%, more than MBLAX's 4.41% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MBLAX
Madison Diversified Income Fund
4.41%4.92%7.37%15.29%8.09%12.04%2.77%6.69%10.66%3.14%5.38%4.00%
MMDAX
Madison Moderate Allocation Fund
5.63%6.12%3.70%2.15%1.39%8.46%9.24%3.95%9.05%5.13%4.36%7.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


MMDAX and MBLAX have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MMDAX has higher volatility (2.87%) compared to MBLAX (1.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MMDAX dropped -43.12% vs MBLAX's -26.64%.

MMDAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.13 vs 1.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MMDAX and MBLAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer