PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MINVX vs. MBOAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MINVX vs. MBOAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Madison Investors Fund (MINVX) and Madison Core Bond Fund (MBOAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MINVX achieves a 5.21% return, which is significantly higher than MBOAX's 0.12% return. Over the past 10 years, MINVX has outperformed MBOAX with an annualized return of 12.56%, while MBOAX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.61% annualized return.


MINVX

1D
0.07%
1M
-0.71%
YTD
5.21%
6M
4.59%
1Y
8.17%
3Y*
13.26%
5Y*
8.96%
10Y*
12.56%

MBOAX

1D
0.11%
1M
0.51%
YTD
0.12%
6M
0.02%
1Y
5.02%
3Y*
3.92%
5Y*
0.05%
10Y*
1.61%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MINVX vs. MBOAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MINVX
Madison Investors Fund
5.21%3.30%16.38%26.12%-13.18%22.70%14.48%30.48%0.64%22.53%
MBOAX
Madison Core Bond Fund
0.12%6.96%1.14%5.63%-12.82%-1.85%9.22%8.31%-0.98%3.02%

Correlation

The correlation between MINVX and MBOAX is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.31

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.22

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.16

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.03

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 30, 1997

-0.13

The correlation between MINVX and MBOAX shifts across timeframes, from -0.13 (all time) to 0.31 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MINVX vs. MBOAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MINVX
MINVX Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
MINVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MINVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
MINVX Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
MINVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
MINVX Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank

MBOAX
MBOAX Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
MBOAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MBOAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
MBOAX Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
MBOAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
MBOAX Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MINVX vs. MBOAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Madison Investors Fund (MINVX) and Madison Core Bond Fund (MBOAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MINVXMBOAXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.71

1.35

-0.64

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.12

2.01

-0.88

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.25

-0.12

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.95

1.76

-0.81

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

2.86

5.40

-2.54

MINVX vs. MBOAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MINVX Sharpe Ratio is 0.71, which is lower than the MBOAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MINVX and MBOAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MINVXMBOAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.71

1.35

-0.64

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

0.01

+0.54

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.74

0.35

+0.39

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.36

0.74

-0.38

Drawdowns

MINVX vs. MBOAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MINVX drawdown since its inception was -52.40%, which is greater than MBOAX's maximum drawdown of -17.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MINVX and MBOAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MINVXMBOAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-52.40%

-17.78%

-34.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.00%

-2.93%

-7.07%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.23%

-6.10%

-10.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.46%

-17.55%

-3.91%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.85%

-17.78%

-16.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.80%

-2.11%

+0.31%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.57%

-2.36%

-5.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.31%

0.95%

+2.36%

Volatility

MINVX vs. MBOAX - Volatility Comparison

Madison Investors Fund (MINVX) has a higher volatility of 2.49% compared to Madison Core Bond Fund (MBOAX) at 1.45%. This indicates that MINVX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MBOAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MINVXMBOAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.49%

1.45%

+1.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.71%

2.78%

+6.93%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.31%

3.81%

+9.50%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.29%

5.61%

+10.68%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.02%

4.65%

+12.37%

MINVX vs. MBOAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MINVX has a 0.91% expense ratio, which is higher than MBOAX's 0.85% expense ratio.


Dividends

MINVX vs. MBOAX - Dividend Comparison

MINVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.93%, more than MBOAX's 3.49% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MBOAX
Madison Core Bond Fund
3.49%3.39%3.27%2.73%1.88%1.85%3.77%2.42%2.48%2.28%2.72%4.60%
MINVX
Madison Investors Fund
6.93%7.30%6.09%8.18%6.64%7.82%9.86%6.02%18.77%5.91%3.31%16.40%

Frequently Asked Questions


MINVX and MBOAX have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MINVX has higher volatility (2.49%) compared to MBOAX (1.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MINVX dropped -52.40% vs MBOAX's -17.78%.

MBOAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.35 vs 0.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MINVX and MBOAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer