PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MINVX vs. BHBFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MINVX vs. BHBFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Madison Investors Fund (MINVX) and Madison Dividend Income Fund (BHBFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MINVX achieves a 7.64% return, which is significantly lower than BHBFX's 12.04% return. Over the past 10 years, MINVX has outperformed BHBFX with an annualized return of 12.45%, while BHBFX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.77% annualized return.


MINVX

1D
1.41%
1M
0.77%
6M
2.24%
YTD
7.64%
1Y
14.22%
3Y*
10.72%
5Y*
8.64%
10Y*
12.45%
ALL TIME*
8.18%

BHBFX

1D
0.07%
1M
1.39%
6M
5.01%
YTD
12.04%
1Y
16.83%
3Y*
8.96%
5Y*
6.05%
10Y*
9.77%
ALL TIME*
10.03%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

MINVX vs. BHBFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MINVX
Madison Investors Fund
7.64%3.30%16.38%26.12%-13.18%22.70%14.48%30.48%0.64%22.53%
BHBFX
Madison Dividend Income Fund
12.04%8.19%7.62%1.76%-5.50%22.82%6.34%25.17%-0.81%19.94%

Correlation

The correlation between MINVX and BHBFX is 0.67, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.67

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.76

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.80

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 31, 1986

0.91

Over the past year, the correlation between MINVX and BHBFX has dropped to 0.67 - well below their long-term average of 0.91, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MINVX vs. BHBFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

MINVX
MINVX Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
MINVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MINVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
MINVX Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
MINVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
MINVX Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank

BHBFX
BHBFX Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
BHBFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BHBFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
BHBFX Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
BHBFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
BHBFX Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

MINVX vs. BHBFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Madison Investors Fund (MINVX) and Madison Dividend Income Fund (BHBFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MINVXBHBFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.65

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.96

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.27

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.23

2.49

-1.25

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.71

6.92

-2.21

MINVX vs. BHBFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MINVX Sharpe Ratio is 0.90, which is lower than the BHBFX Sharpe Ratio of 1.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MINVX and BHBFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MINVX vs. BHBFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MINVX drawdown since its inception was -52.40%, which is greater than BHBFX's maximum drawdown of -34.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MINVX and BHBFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MINVXBHBFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-52.40%

-34.07%

-18.33%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.00%

-6.39%

-3.61%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.23%

-14.32%

-1.91%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.46%

-23.80%

+2.34%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.85%

-32.34%

-1.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.10%

+1.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.55%

-3.69%

-3.86%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.62%

2.29%

+0.33%

Volatility

MINVX vs. BHBFX - Volatility Comparison

Madison Investors Fund (MINVX) has a higher volatility of 3.51% compared to Madison Dividend Income Fund (BHBFX) at 3.04%. This indicates that MINVX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BHBFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MINVXBHBFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.51%

3.04%

+0.47%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.18%

7.40%

+2.78%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.71%

10.26%

+3.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.37%

15.53%

+0.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.01%

17.32%

-0.31%

MINVX vs. BHBFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both MINVX and BHBFX have an expense ratio of 0.91%.


Dividends

MINVX vs. BHBFX - Dividend Comparison

MINVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.78%, less than BHBFX's 11.18% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BHBFX
Madison Dividend Income Fund
11.18%12.41%14.14%6.01%9.39%11.53%1.53%3.95%12.73%3.89%3.76%6.06%
MINVX
Madison Investors Fund
6.78%7.30%6.09%8.18%6.64%7.82%9.86%6.02%18.77%5.91%3.31%16.40%

Frequently Asked Questions


MINVX and BHBFX have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MINVX has higher volatility (3.51%) compared to BHBFX (3.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MINVX dropped -52.40% vs BHBFX's -34.07%.

BHBFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.56 vs 0.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MINVX and BHBFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer