PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MINVX vs. SCHG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MINVX vs. SCHG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Madison Investors Fund (MINVX) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MINVX achieves a 5.21% return, which is significantly lower than SCHG's 6.42% return. Over the past 10 years, MINVX has underperformed SCHG with an annualized return of 12.56%, while SCHG has yielded a comparatively higher 18.77% annualized return.


MINVX

1D
0.07%
1M
-0.71%
YTD
5.21%
6M
4.59%
1Y
8.17%
3Y*
13.26%
5Y*
8.96%
10Y*
12.56%

SCHG

1D
-1.23%
1M
4.81%
YTD
6.42%
6M
5.81%
1Y
24.64%
3Y*
25.02%
5Y*
15.59%
10Y*
18.77%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MINVX vs. SCHG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MINVX
Madison Investors Fund
5.21%3.30%16.38%26.12%-13.18%22.70%14.48%30.48%0.64%22.53%
SCHG
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF
6.42%17.50%34.95%50.10%-31.80%28.11%39.14%36.02%-1.36%28.05%

Correlation

The correlation between MINVX and SCHG is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.57

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.66

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.79

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 14, 2009

0.84

Over the past year, the correlation between MINVX and SCHG has dropped to 0.57 - well below their long-term average of 0.84, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MINVX vs. SCHG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MINVX
MINVX Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
MINVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MINVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
MINVX Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
MINVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
MINVX Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHG
SCHG Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
SCHG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHG Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHG Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHG Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MINVX vs. SCHG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Madison Investors Fund (MINVX) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MINVXSCHGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.89

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.28

-0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.95

1.51

-0.56

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.86

5.04

-2.19

MINVX vs. SCHG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MINVX Sharpe Ratio is 0.71, which is lower than the SCHG Sharpe Ratio of 1.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MINVX and SCHG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MINVXSCHGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.71

1.60

-0.89

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

0.70

-0.15

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.74

0.87

-0.13

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.36

0.84

-0.49

Drawdowns

MINVX vs. SCHG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MINVX drawdown since its inception was -52.40%, which is greater than SCHG's maximum drawdown of -34.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MINVX and SCHG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MINVXSCHGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-52.40%

-34.59%

-17.81%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.00%

-16.41%

+6.41%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.23%

-23.39%

+7.16%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.46%

-34.59%

+13.13%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.85%

-34.59%

+0.74%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.80%

-1.78%

-0.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.57%

-5.20%

-2.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.31%

4.90%

-1.59%

Volatility

MINVX vs. SCHG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Madison Investors Fund (MINVX) is 2.49%, while Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) has a volatility of 3.61%. This indicates that MINVX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MINVXSCHGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.49%

3.61%

-1.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.71%

11.62%

-1.91%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.31%

15.50%

-2.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.29%

22.27%

-5.98%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.02%

21.55%

-4.53%

MINVX vs. SCHG - Expense Ratio Comparison

MINVX has a 0.91% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHG's 0.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

MINVX vs. SCHG - Dividend Comparison

MINVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.93%, more than SCHG's 0.36% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MINVX
Madison Investors Fund
6.93%7.30%6.09%8.18%6.64%7.82%9.86%6.02%18.77%5.91%3.31%16.40%
SCHG
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF
0.36%0.36%0.39%0.46%0.55%0.42%0.52%0.82%1.27%1.01%1.04%1.22%

Frequently Asked Questions


MINVX and SCHG have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SCHG has higher volatility (3.61%) compared to MINVX (2.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MINVX dropped -52.40% vs SCHG's -34.59%.

SCHG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.60 vs 0.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MINVX and SCHG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer