MLOZX vs. RSNRX
Compare and contrast key facts about Cohen & Steers MLP & Energy Opportunity Fund, Inc. (MLOZX) and Victory Global Energy Transition Fund (RSNRX).
MLOZX is managed by Cohen & Steers. It was launched on Dec 19, 2013. RSNRX is managed by Victory. It was launched on Nov 14, 1995.
Performance
MLOZX vs. RSNRX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
MLOZX vs. RSNRX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MLOZX Cohen & Steers MLP & Energy Opportunity Fund, Inc. | 28.28% | 17.35% | 12.16% | 10.49% | 21.10% | 39.09% | -26.70% | 12.62% | -13.43% | 0.33% |
RSNRX Victory Global Energy Transition Fund | 16.87% | 69.60% | 15.94% | -8.64% | 35.02% | 83.01% | 27.35% | -24.49% | -45.81% | 1.02% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MLOZX achieves a 28.28% return, which is significantly higher than RSNRX's 16.87% return. Over the past 10 years, MLOZX has underperformed RSNRX with an annualized return of 11.92%, while RSNRX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.96% annualized return.
MLOZX
- 1D
- 0.32%
- 1M
- 5.97%
- YTD
- 28.28%
- 6M
- 32.61%
- 1Y
- 50.15%
- 3Y*
- 22.84%
- 5Y*
- 21.07%
- 10Y*
- 11.92%
RSNRX
- 1D
- 1.28%
- 1M
- 0.26%
- YTD
- 16.87%
- 6M
- 31.78%
- 1Y
- 107.01%
- 3Y*
- 27.41%
- 5Y*
- 30.06%
- 10Y*
- 13.96%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MLOZX vs. RSNRX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MLOZX has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is lower than RSNRX's 1.48% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
MLOZX vs. RSNRX — Risk / Return Rank
MLOZX
RSNRX
MLOZX vs. RSNRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cohen & Steers MLP & Energy Opportunity Fund, Inc. (MLOZX) and Victory Global Energy Transition Fund (RSNRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MLOZX | RSNRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.59 | 4.08 | -1.49 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.10 | 4.47 | -1.37 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.51 | 1.66 | -0.15 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.14 | 7.33 | -4.18 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.97 | 27.20 | -13.24 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MLOZX | RSNRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.59 | 4.08 | -1.49 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.16 | 1.19 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.50 | 0.44 | +0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.27 | 0.29 | -0.03 |
Correlation
The correlation between MLOZX and RSNRX is 0.72, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
MLOZX vs. RSNRX - Dividend Comparison
MLOZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.09%, less than RSNRX's 3.75% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MLOZX Cohen & Steers MLP & Energy Opportunity Fund, Inc. | 1.09% | 1.71% | 10.24% | 4.61% | 3.66% | 3.08% | 6.57% | 6.21% | 4.44% | 3.86% | 3.72% | 6.05% |
RSNRX Victory Global Energy Transition Fund | 3.75% | 4.38% | 1.65% | 2.36% | 0.78% | 0.00% | 0.05% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
MLOZX vs. RSNRX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MLOZX drawdown since its inception was -72.01%, smaller than the maximum RSNRX drawdown of -89.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MLOZX and RSNRX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| MLOZX | RSNRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -72.01% | -89.73% | +17.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.08% | -14.36% | -1.72% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.84% | -25.44% | +4.60% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -64.94% | -84.27% | +19.33% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.24% | -0.65% | +0.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.91% | -26.07% | +5.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.62% | 3.87% | -0.25% |
Volatility
MLOZX vs. RSNRX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Cohen & Steers MLP & Energy Opportunity Fund, Inc. (MLOZX) is 4.27%, while Victory Global Energy Transition Fund (RSNRX) has a volatility of 6.66%. This indicates that MLOZX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RSNRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| MLOZX | RSNRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.27% | 6.66% | -2.39% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.97% | 19.24% | -8.27% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.98% | 26.79% | -6.81% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.26% | 25.47% | -7.21% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.16% | 31.80% | -7.64% |