RSNRX vs. DNLAX
Compare and contrast key facts about Victory Global Energy Transition Fund (RSNRX) and BNY Mellon Natural Resources Fund Class A (DNLAX).
RSNRX is managed by Victory. It was launched on Nov 14, 1995. DNLAX is managed by BNY Mellon. It was launched on Oct 31, 2003.
Performance
RSNRX vs. DNLAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
RSNRX vs. DNLAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RSNRX Victory Global Energy Transition Fund | 16.87% | 69.60% | 15.94% | -8.64% | 35.02% | 83.01% | 27.35% | -24.49% | -45.81% | 1.02% |
DNLAX BNY Mellon Natural Resources Fund Class A | 24.60% | 14.75% | 0.86% | 1.33% | 33.83% | 38.00% | 6.30% | 16.33% | -17.78% | 13.69% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RSNRX achieves a 16.87% return, which is significantly lower than DNLAX's 24.60% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with RSNRX having a 13.96% annualized return and DNLAX not far ahead at 14.25%.
RSNRX
- 1D
- 1.28%
- 1M
- 0.26%
- YTD
- 16.87%
- 6M
- 31.78%
- 1Y
- 107.01%
- 3Y*
- 27.41%
- 5Y*
- 30.06%
- 10Y*
- 13.96%
DNLAX
- 1D
- 1.61%
- 1M
- -0.73%
- YTD
- 24.60%
- 6M
- 33.31%
- 1Y
- 48.70%
- 3Y*
- 14.47%
- 5Y*
- 17.85%
- 10Y*
- 14.25%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
RSNRX vs. DNLAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
RSNRX has a 1.48% expense ratio, which is higher than DNLAX's 1.14% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
RSNRX vs. DNLAX — Risk / Return Rank
RSNRX
DNLAX
RSNRX vs. DNLAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Victory Global Energy Transition Fund (RSNRX) and BNY Mellon Natural Resources Fund Class A (DNLAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RSNRX | DNLAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 4.08 | 1.87 | +2.20 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 4.47 | 2.34 | +2.13 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.66 | 1.37 | +0.29 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 7.33 | 2.36 | +4.96 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 27.20 | 10.73 | +16.47 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RSNRX | DNLAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.08 | 1.87 | +2.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.19 | 0.69 | +0.50 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.44 | 0.56 | -0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.29 | 0.37 | -0.07 |
Correlation
The correlation between RSNRX and DNLAX is 0.86, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
RSNRX vs. DNLAX - Dividend Comparison
RSNRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.75%, more than DNLAX's 1.76% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RSNRX Victory Global Energy Transition Fund | 3.75% | 4.38% | 1.65% | 2.36% | 0.78% | 0.00% | 0.05% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
DNLAX BNY Mellon Natural Resources Fund Class A | 1.76% | 2.19% | 7.75% | 12.54% | 9.80% | 5.04% | 0.91% | 1.95% | 1.53% | 0.40% | 1.26% | 0.98% |
Drawdowns
RSNRX vs. DNLAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RSNRX drawdown since its inception was -89.73%, which is greater than DNLAX's maximum drawdown of -69.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSNRX and DNLAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| RSNRX | DNLAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -89.73% | -69.14% | -20.59% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.36% | -20.87% | +6.51% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.44% | -32.37% | +6.93% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -84.27% | -54.45% | -29.82% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.65% | -0.73% | +0.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -26.07% | -21.71% | -4.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.87% | 4.60% | -0.73% |
Volatility
RSNRX vs. DNLAX - Volatility Comparison
Victory Global Energy Transition Fund (RSNRX) has a higher volatility of 6.66% compared to BNY Mellon Natural Resources Fund Class A (DNLAX) at 6.24%. This indicates that RSNRX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DNLAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| RSNRX | DNLAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.66% | 6.24% | +0.42% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.24% | 15.26% | +3.98% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.79% | 26.60% | +0.19% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.47% | 25.95% | -0.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.80% | 25.58% | +6.22% |