RSNRX vs. FFGCX

In the year-to-date period, RSNRX achieves a 12.39% return, which is significantly higher than FFGCX's 4.23% return. Over the past 10 years, RSNRX has underperformed FFGCX with an annualized return of 3.23%, while FFGCX has yielded a comparatively higher 6.26% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

RSNRX has a 1.48% expense ratio, which is higher than FFGCX's 0.94% expense ratio.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Victory Global Energy Transition Fund (RSNRX) and Fidelity Global Commodity Stock Fund (FFGCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current RSNRX Sharpe Ratio is 0.46, which is higher than the FFGCX Sharpe Ratio of -0.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RSNRX and FFGCX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

RSNRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.47%, less than FFGCX's 2.51% yield.

The maximum RSNRX drawdown since its inception was -89.73%, which is greater than FFGCX's maximum drawdown of -56.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSNRX and FFGCX.

Victory Global Energy Transition Fund (RSNRX) has a higher volatility of 7.48% compared to Fidelity Global Commodity Stock Fund (FFGCX) at 3.52%. This indicates that RSNRX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FFGCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.