MIDSX vs. EKWAX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

MIDSX (Midas Fund) and EKWAX (Allspring Precious Metals Fund) are both Precious Metals funds. Over the past 10 years, MIDSX returned 11.17%/yr vs 14.99%/yr for EKWAX. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. MIDSX charges 4.25%/yr vs 1.09%/yr for EKWAX.

Performance

MIDSX vs. EKWAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Midas Fund (MIDSX) and Allspring Precious Metals Fund (EKWAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MIDSX achieves a 5.73% return, which is significantly higher than EKWAX's 2.44% return. Over the past 10 years, MIDSX has underperformed EKWAX with an annualized return of 11.17%, while EKWAX has yielded a comparatively higher 14.99% annualized return.

MIDSX

• 1D: 0.27%
• 1M: -0.00%
• YTD: 5.73%
• 6M: 13.54%
• 1Y: 71.63%
• 3Y*: 45.42%
• 5Y*: 18.49%
• 10Y*: 11.17%

EKWAX

• 1D: 0.79%
• 1M: 2.09%
• YTD: 2.44%
• 6M: 10.65%
• 1Y: 67.73%
• 3Y*: 46.98%
• 5Y*: 23.54%
• 10Y*: 14.99%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MIDSX vs. EKWAX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
MIDSX Midas Fund	5.73%	195.76%	7.27%	-1.79%	-11.11%	-19.23%	10.64%	30.56%	-12.90%	5.98%
EKWAX Allspring Precious Metals Fund	2.44%	163.65%	21.28%	8.83%	-7.75%	-11.00%	24.40%	40.35%	-12.83%	9.66%

Correlation

The correlation between MIDSX and EKWAX is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.97
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.94
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.94
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.93
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 20, 1998	0.91

The correlation between MIDSX and EKWAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

MIDSX vs. EKWAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MIDSX

MIDSX Risk / Return Rank: 31
MIDSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 34
MIDSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 24
MIDSX Omega Ratio Rank: 31
MIDSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 40
MIDSX Martin Ratio Rank: 27

EKWAX

EKWAX Risk / Return Rank: 28
EKWAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 30
EKWAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 21
EKWAX Omega Ratio Rank: 28
EKWAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 38
EKWAX Martin Ratio Rank: 24

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MIDSX vs. EKWAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Midas Fund (MIDSX) and Allspring Precious Metals Fund (EKWAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MIDSX	EKWAX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.67	1.56	+0.11
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.04	1.94	+0.10
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.29	1.28	+0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.41	2.33	+0.08
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.46	6.04	+0.42
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MIDSX vs. EKWAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MIDSX Sharpe Ratio is 1.67, which is comparable to the EKWAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MIDSX and EKWAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MIDSX	EKWAX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.67	1.56	+0.11
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.54	0.71	-0.17
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.34	0.45	-0.12
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.01	0.33	-0.34

Drawdowns

MIDSX vs. EKWAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MIDSX drawdown since its inception was -89.77%, which is greater than EKWAX's maximum drawdown of -76.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MIDSX and EKWAX.

Drawdown Indicators

	MIDSX	EKWAX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-89.77%	-76.76%	-13.01%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-30.18%	-29.03%	-1.15%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-31.45%	-29.03%	-2.42%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-46.54%	-42.79%	-3.75%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-57.07%	-49.23%	-7.84%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-39.14%	-23.83%	-15.31%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-63.52%	-32.77%	-30.75%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	11.25%	11.16%	+0.09%

Volatility

MIDSX vs. EKWAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Midas Fund (MIDSX) is 14.20%, while Allspring Precious Metals Fund (EKWAX) has a volatility of 14.98%. This indicates that MIDSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EKWAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MIDSX	EKWAX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	14.20%	14.98%	-0.78%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	36.23%	35.67%	+0.56%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	43.87%	43.68%	+0.19%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	34.53%	33.49%	+1.04%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	33.29%	33.07%	+0.22%

MIDSX vs. EKWAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MIDSX has a 4.25% expense ratio, which is higher than EKWAX's 1.09% expense ratio.

Dividends

MIDSX vs. EKWAX - Dividend Comparison

MIDSX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EKWAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.17%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
EKWAX Allspring Precious Metals Fund	1.17%	1.19%	0.84%	0.00%	2.01%	1.35%	1.45%	0.11%	0.00%	1.34%	1.11%
MIDSX Midas Fund	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MIDSX and EKWAX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.97, MIDSX and EKWAX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, MIDSX or EKWAX?

EKWAX has higher volatility (14.98%) compared to MIDSX (14.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MIDSX dropped -89.77% vs EKWAX's -76.76%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MIDSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.67 vs 1.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.