MIDSX vs. FSAGX

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

MIDSX (Midas Fund) and FSAGX (Fidelity Select Gold Portfolio) are both mutual funds - MIDSX is a Precious Metals fund managed by Midas, while FSAGX is a Gold fund managed by Fidelity. Over the past 10 years, MIDSX returned 10.23%/yr vs 11.15%/yr for FSAGX. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. MIDSX charges 4.25%/yr vs 0.73%/yr for FSAGX.

Performance

MIDSX vs. FSAGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Midas Fund (MIDSX) and Fidelity Select Gold Portfolio (FSAGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MIDSX achieves a -0.57% return, which is significantly higher than FSAGX's -1.23% return. Over the past 10 years, MIDSX has underperformed FSAGX with an annualized return of 10.23%, while FSAGX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.15% annualized return.

MIDSX

• 1D: -3.07%
• 1M: -4.93%
• YTD: -0.57%
• 6M: -4.67%
• 1Y: 65.24%
• 3Y*: 43.27%
• 5Y*: 20.25%
• 10Y*: 10.23%

FSAGX

• 1D: -2.85%
• 1M: -2.22%
• YTD: -1.23%
• 6M: -5.62%
• 1Y: 52.86%
• 3Y*: 39.09%
• 5Y*: 17.32%
• 10Y*: 11.15%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MIDSX vs. FSAGX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
MIDSX Midas Fund	-0.57%	195.76%	7.27%	-1.79%	-11.11%	-19.23%	10.64%	30.56%	-12.90%	5.98%
FSAGX Fidelity Select Gold Portfolio	-1.23%	143.05%	14.97%	-0.37%	-13.46%	-10.44%	26.83%	35.50%	-13.00%	8.63%

Correlation

The correlation between MIDSX and FSAGX is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.97
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.94
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.93
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.92
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 9, 1995	0.90

The correlation between MIDSX and FSAGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

MIDSX vs. FSAGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MIDSX

MIDSX Risk / Return Rank: 24
MIDSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 26
MIDSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 21
MIDSX Omega Ratio Rank: 27
MIDSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 23
MIDSX Martin Ratio Rank: 21

FSAGX

FSAGX Risk / Return Rank: 17
FSAGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 18
FSAGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 16
FSAGX Omega Ratio Rank: 20
FSAGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 18
FSAGX Martin Ratio Rank: 15

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MIDSX vs. FSAGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Midas Fund (MIDSX) and Fidelity Select Gold Portfolio (FSAGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MIDSX	FSAGX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.37	1.13	+0.24
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.78	1.55	+0.23
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.25	1.22	+0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.66	1.44	+0.23
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.90	3.92	+0.98

MIDSX vs. FSAGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MIDSX Sharpe Ratio is 1.37, which is comparable to the FSAGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MIDSX and FSAGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

MIDSX vs. FSAGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MIDSX drawdown since its inception was -89.77%, which is greater than FSAGX's maximum drawdown of -77.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MIDSX and FSAGX.

Drawdown Indicators

	MIDSX	FSAGX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-89.77%	-77.21%	-12.56%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-37.99%	-35.40%	-2.59%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-37.99%	-35.40%	-2.59%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-43.33%	-45.94%	+2.61%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-57.07%	-50.57%	-6.50%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-42.77%	-27.67%	-15.10%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-63.48%	-33.34%	-30.14%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	12.90%	12.97%	-0.07%

Volatility

MIDSX vs. FSAGX - Volatility Comparison

Midas Fund (MIDSX) and Fidelity Select Gold Portfolio (FSAGX) have volatilities of 17.96% and 17.25%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MIDSX	FSAGX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	17.96%	17.25%	+0.71%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	39.40%	37.82%	+1.58%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	46.19%	45.03%	+1.16%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	35.03%	34.09%	+0.94%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	33.60%	33.38%	+0.22%

MIDSX vs. FSAGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MIDSX has a 4.25% expense ratio, which is higher than FSAGX's 0.73% expense ratio.

Dividends

MIDSX vs. FSAGX - Dividend Comparison

MIDSX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FSAGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.20%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
FSAGX Fidelity Select Gold Portfolio	5.20%	2.17%	3.62%	0.99%	0.36%	1.60%	4.40%	0.40%	0.00%	0.22%	3.57%
MIDSX Midas Fund	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MIDSX and FSAGX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.97, MIDSX and FSAGX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, MIDSX or FSAGX?

MIDSX has higher volatility (17.96%) compared to FSAGX (17.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MIDSX dropped -89.77% vs FSAGX's -77.21%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MIDSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.37 vs 1.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.