MIDSX vs. RING

In the year-to-date period, MIDSX achieves a 60.17% return, which is significantly higher than RING's 46.53% return. Over the past 10 years, MIDSX has underperformed RING with an annualized return of 6.18%, while RING has yielded a comparatively higher 11.05% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

MIDSX has a 4.25% expense ratio, which is higher than RING's 0.39% expense ratio.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Midas Fund (MIDSX) and iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF (RING). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current MIDSX Sharpe Ratio is 2.13, which is comparable to the RING Sharpe Ratio of 1.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MIDSX and RING, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

MIDSX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while RING's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.98%.

The maximum MIDSX drawdown since its inception was -95.27%, which is greater than RING's maximum drawdown of -79.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MIDSX and RING. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

Midas Fund (MIDSX) and iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF (RING) have volatilities of 15.61% and 16.08%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.