MIDE vs. VO
MIDE (Xtrackers S&P MidCap 400 ESG ETF) and VO (Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF) are both Mid Cap Blend Equities funds - MIDE tracks the S&P MidCap 400 ESG Index while VO tracks the CRSP US Mid Cap Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, MIDE returned 8.31%/yr vs 7.87%/yr for VO. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. MIDE charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VO.
Performance
MIDE vs. VO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MIDE achieves a 14.45% return, which is significantly higher than VO's 10.05% return.
MIDE
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- 5.36%
- YTD
- 14.45%
- 6M
- 14.97%
- 1Y
- 28.35%
- 3Y*
- 16.42%
- 5Y*
- 8.31%
- 10Y*
- —
VO
- 1D
- -0.45%
- 1M
- 3.20%
- YTD
- 10.05%
- 6M
- 9.73%
- 1Y
- 18.13%
- 3Y*
- 16.69%
- 5Y*
- 7.87%
- 10Y*
- 11.55%
MIDE vs. VO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MIDE Xtrackers S&P MidCap 400 ESG ETF | 14.45% | 9.81% | 11.21% | 15.20% | -11.63% | 11.77% |
VO Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF | 10.05% | 11.62% | 15.31% | 16.03% | -18.73% | 15.58% |
Correlation
The correlation between MIDE and VO is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 25, 2021 | 0.94 |
The correlation between MIDE and VO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.
MIDE vs. VO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
MIDE
VO
Industrials
Financial Services
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Real Estate
Energy
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Communication Services
Industrials
MIDE
VO
Financial Services
MIDE
VO
Technology
MIDE
VO
Consumer Cyclical
MIDE
VO
Healthcare
MIDE
VO
Real Estate
MIDE
VO
Energy
MIDE
VO
Basic Materials
MIDE
VO
Consumer Defensive
MIDE
VO
Utilities
MIDE
VO
Communication Services
MIDE
VO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MIDE vs. VO — Risk / Return Rank
MIDE
VO
MIDE vs. VO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers S&P MidCap 400 ESG ETF (MIDE) and Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF (VO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MIDE | VO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.32 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.46 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.26 | +0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.04 | 2.23 | +0.81 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.84 | 8.50 | +2.34 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MIDE | VO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.80 | 1.48 | +0.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.42 | 0.45 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.61 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.47 | 0.50 | -0.03 |
Drawdowns
MIDE vs. VO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MIDE drawdown since its inception was -24.59%, smaller than the maximum VO drawdown of -58.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MIDE and VO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MIDE | VO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.59% | -58.87% | +34.28% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.36% | -8.17% | -1.19% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.59% | -19.02% | -5.57% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.59% | -27.57% | +2.98% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -39.37% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.04% | -0.45% | +0.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.50% | -7.86% | +1.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.62% | 2.14% | +0.48% |
Volatility
MIDE vs. VO - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers S&P MidCap 400 ESG ETF (MIDE) has a higher volatility of 4.59% compared to Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF (VO) at 2.99%. This indicates that MIDE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MIDE | VO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.59% | 2.99% | +1.60% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.41% | 9.21% | +2.20% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.86% | 12.34% | +3.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.71% | 17.59% | +2.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.67% | 18.95% | +0.72% |
MIDE vs. VO - Expense Ratio Comparison
MIDE has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than VO's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
MIDE vs. VO - Dividend Comparison
MIDE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.31%, less than VO's 1.36% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MIDE Xtrackers S&P MidCap 400 ESG ETF | 1.31% | 1.52% | 1.45% | 1.36% | 1.33% | 0.93% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VO Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF | 1.36% | 1.52% | 1.49% | 1.52% | 1.60% | 1.12% | 1.45% | 1.48% | 1.82% | 1.35% | 1.45% | 1.47% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MIDE and VO have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MIDE has higher volatility (4.59%) compared to VO (2.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MIDE dropped -24.59% vs VO's -58.87%.
On 5-year performance, MIDE leads with 8.31% vs 7.87% for VO. On fees, VO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VO has been the lower-risk option at 2.99%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, MIDE has performed better with a 8.31% return vs 7.87%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for MIDE.
VO has the higher dividend yield at 1.36%, compared with 1.31% for MIDE.
MIDE tracks S&P MidCap 400 ESG Index, while VO tracks CRSP US Mid Cap Index. They also come from different issuers: Deutsche Bank and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for MIDE and 0.03% for VO.
MIDE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.80 vs 1.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MIDE and VO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer