MIDE vs. CN

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Xtrackers S&P MidCap 400 ESG ETF (MIDE) and Xtrackers MSCI All China Equity ETF (CN).

MIDE and CN are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. MIDE is a passively managed fund by Deutsche Bank that tracks the performance of the S&P MidCap 400 ESG Index. It was launched on Feb 24, 2021. CN is a passively managed fund by Deutsche Bank that tracks the performance of the MSCI China All Shares. It was launched on Apr 30, 2014. Both MIDE and CN are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

MIDE vs. CN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers S&P MidCap 400 ESG ETF (MIDE) and Xtrackers MSCI All China Equity ETF (CN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

MIDE vs. CN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
MIDE Xtrackers S&P MidCap 400 ESG ETF	2.61%	9.81%	11.21%	15.20%	-11.63%	11.77%
CN Xtrackers MSCI All China Equity ETF	0.00%	0.00%	-3.10%	-11.87%	-23.85%	-20.23%

Returns By Period

MIDE

• 1D: 0.85%
• 1M: -5.40%
• YTD: 2.61%
• 6M: 5.51%
• 1Y: 19.04%
• 3Y*: 11.96%
• 5Y*: 6.70%
• 10Y*: —

CN

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MIDE vs. CN - Expense Ratio Comparison

MIDE has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than CN's 0.50% expense ratio.

CN

Xtrackers MSCI All China Equity ETF

MIDE

Xtrackers S&P MidCap 400 ESG ETF

Return for Risk

MIDE vs. CN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MIDE

MIDE Risk / Return Rank: 48
MIDE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 46
MIDE Sortino Ratio Rank: 49
MIDE Omega Ratio Rank: 47
MIDE Calmar Ratio Rank: 47
MIDE Martin Ratio Rank: 52

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MIDE vs. CN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers S&P MidCap 400 ESG ETF (MIDE) and Xtrackers MSCI All China Equity ETF (CN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MIDE	CN	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.90	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.39	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.19	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.35	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	5.59	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MIDE	CN	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.90	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.34	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.37	—	—

Correlation

The correlation between MIDE and CN is 0.29, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

MIDE vs. CN - Dividend Comparison

MIDE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.46%, while CN has not paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
MIDE Xtrackers S&P MidCap 400 ESG ETF	1.46%	1.52%	1.45%	1.36%	1.33%	0.93%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
CN Xtrackers MSCI All China Equity ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	4.04%	1.80%	2.00%	0.78%	4.18%	2.09%	0.81%	11.41%	14.00%

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	MIDE	CN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-24.59%	—	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.54%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-24.59%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.94%	—	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.67%	—	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.50%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	MIDE	CN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.19%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.92%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	21.24%	—	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.69%	—	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.80%	—	—