PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MIDE vs. VOO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MIDE vs. VOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers S&P MidCap 400 ESG ETF (MIDE) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MIDE achieves a 15.09% return, which is significantly higher than VOO's 10.16% return.


MIDE

1D
0.02%
1M
-0.21%
6M
10.55%
YTD
15.09%
1Y
25.54%
3Y*
13.06%
5Y*
8.56%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
9.04%

VOO

1D
0.71%
1M
0.26%
6M
8.58%
YTD
10.16%
1Y
21.58%
3Y*
19.42%
5Y*
12.83%
10Y*
15.14%
ALL TIME*
14.78%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$7.22K$26.17K$21.85K
$3.82B$3.78B$5.44B

MIDE vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
MIDE
Xtrackers S&P MidCap 400 ESG ETF
15.09%9.81%11.21%15.20%-11.63%11.80%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
10.16%17.82%24.98%26.32%-18.17%24.26%

Correlation

The correlation between MIDE and VOO is 0.74, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.74

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.78

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 24, 2021

0.82

The correlation between MIDE and VOO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.

MIDE vs. VOO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
MIDE
VOO

Industrials

19.6%
8.5%

Financial Services

16.6%
11.4%

Technology

13.7%
38.6%

Consumer Cyclical

10.7%
9.5%

Healthcare

9.7%
8.9%

Real Estate

9.1%
1.8%

Basic Materials

7.2%
1.7%

Energy

6.0%
3.0%

Consumer Defensive

3.4%
4.5%

Utilities

1.7%
2.2%

Communication Services

1.1%
9.9%

Industrials

MIDE
19.6%
VOO
8.5%

Financial Services

MIDE
16.6%
VOO
11.4%

Technology

MIDE
13.7%
VOO
38.6%

Consumer Cyclical

MIDE
10.7%
VOO
9.5%

Healthcare

MIDE
9.7%
VOO
8.9%

Real Estate

MIDE
9.1%
VOO
1.8%

Basic Materials

MIDE
7.2%
VOO
1.7%

Energy

MIDE
6.0%
VOO
3.0%

Consumer Defensive

MIDE
3.4%
VOO
4.5%

Utilities

MIDE
1.7%
VOO
2.2%

Communication Services

MIDE
1.1%
VOO
9.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MIDE vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

MIDE
MIDE Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
MIDE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MIDE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
MIDE Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
MIDE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
MIDE Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

VOO
VOO Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
VOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOO Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
VOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOO Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

MIDE vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers S&P MidCap 400 ESG ETF (MIDE) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MIDEVOODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.09

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.28

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.55

2.21

+0.34

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.19

9.44

-0.25

MIDE vs. VOO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MIDE Sharpe Ratio is 1.51, which is comparable to the VOO Sharpe Ratio of 1.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MIDE and VOO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MIDE vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MIDE drawdown since its inception was -24.59%, smaller than the maximum VOO drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MIDE and VOO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MIDEVOODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.59%

-33.99%

+9.40%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.36%

-8.90%

-0.46%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.59%

-18.69%

-5.90%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.59%

-24.52%

-0.07%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.44%

-1.38%

-0.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.34%

-3.67%

-2.67%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.60%

2.08%

+0.52%

Volatility

MIDE vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers S&P MidCap 400 ESG ETF (MIDE) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) have volatilities of 3.38% and 3.54%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MIDEVOODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.38%

3.54%

-0.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.53%

10.10%

+1.43%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.85%

12.82%

+3.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.61%

16.93%

+2.68%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.51%

18.01%

+1.50%

MIDE vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison

MIDE has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

MIDE vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison

MIDE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.26%, more than VOO's 1.07% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MIDE
Xtrackers S&P MidCap 400 ESG ETF
1.26%1.52%1.45%1.36%1.33%0.93%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
1.07%1.13%1.24%1.46%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.88%2.06%1.78%2.02%2.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


MIDE and VOO have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VOO has higher volatility (3.54%) compared to MIDE (3.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MIDE dropped -24.59% vs VOO's -33.99%.

On 5-year performance, VOO leads with 12.83% vs 8.56% for MIDE. On fees, VOO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, MIDE has been the lower-risk option at 3.38%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, VOO has performed better with a 12.83% return vs 8.56%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VOO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for MIDE.

MIDE has the higher dividend yield at 1.26%, compared with 1.07% for VOO.

MIDE is categorized as Mid Cap Blend Equities, while VOO is S&P 500. MIDE tracks S&P MidCap 400 ESG Index, while VOO tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: Deutsche Bank and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for MIDE and 0.03% for VOO.

VOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.53 vs 1.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MIDE and VOO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer