PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MGV vs. VGIT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MGV vs. VGIT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Mega Cap Value ETF (MGV) and Vanguard Intermediate-Term Treasury ETF (VGIT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MGV achieves a 15.50% return, which is significantly higher than VGIT's -0.29% return. Over the past 10 years, MGV has outperformed VGIT with an annualized return of 13.15%, while VGIT has yielded a comparatively lower 1.20% annualized return.


MGV

1D
0.90%
1M
4.18%
YTD
15.50%
6M
15.37%
1Y
28.69%
3Y*
18.98%
5Y*
12.53%
10Y*
13.15%

VGIT

1D
-0.12%
1M
0.16%
YTD
-0.29%
6M
0.04%
1Y
3.43%
3Y*
3.69%
5Y*
0.01%
10Y*
1.20%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MGV vs. VGIT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MGV
Vanguard Mega Cap Value ETF
15.50%15.45%16.94%9.16%-1.22%25.93%2.50%25.54%-4.13%16.85%
VGIT
Vanguard Intermediate-Term Treasury ETF
-0.29%7.34%1.39%4.28%-10.53%-2.64%7.71%6.19%1.35%1.70%

Correlation

The correlation between MGV and VGIT is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.24

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.15

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.07

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.13

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 23, 2009

-0.24

The correlation between MGV and VGIT shifts across timeframes, from -0.24 (all time) to 0.24 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MGV vs. VGIT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MGV
MGV Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
MGV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MGV Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
MGV Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
MGV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
MGV Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

VGIT
VGIT Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
VGIT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VGIT Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
VGIT Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
VGIT Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
VGIT Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MGV vs. VGIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Mega Cap Value ETF (MGV) and Vanguard Intermediate-Term Treasury ETF (VGIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MGVVGITDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.80

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.45

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.50

1.17

+0.33

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.36

1.13

+3.23

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.56

3.18

+13.38

MGV vs. VGIT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MGV Sharpe Ratio is 2.76, which is higher than the VGIT Sharpe Ratio of 0.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MGV and VGIT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MGV vs. VGIT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MGV drawdown since its inception was -56.07%, which is greater than VGIT's maximum drawdown of -16.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MGV and VGIT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MGVVGITDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.07%

-16.05%

-40.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.42%

-2.83%

-3.59%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.18%

-4.34%

-8.84%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.54%

-15.02%

-1.52%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.41%

-16.05%

-19.36%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-2.22%

+2.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.78%

-3.52%

-4.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.69%

1.01%

+0.68%

Volatility

MGV vs. VGIT - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Mega Cap Value ETF (MGV) has a higher volatility of 3.33% compared to Vanguard Intermediate-Term Treasury ETF (VGIT) at 1.15%. This indicates that MGV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VGIT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MGVVGITDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.33%

1.15%

+2.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.77%

2.40%

+5.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.13%

3.34%

+6.79%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.61%

5.38%

+8.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.35%

4.50%

+11.85%

MGV vs. VGIT - Expense Ratio Comparison

MGV has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is higher than VGIT's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

MGV vs. VGIT - Dividend Comparison

MGV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.85%, less than VGIT's 3.86% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MGV
Vanguard Mega Cap Value ETF
1.85%2.04%2.31%2.48%2.45%2.17%2.47%2.69%2.65%2.34%2.53%2.59%
VGIT
Vanguard Intermediate-Term Treasury ETF
3.86%3.79%3.67%2.73%1.74%1.69%2.23%2.24%2.05%1.67%1.69%1.69%

Frequently Asked Questions


MGV and VGIT have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MGV has higher volatility (3.33%) compared to VGIT (1.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MGV dropped -56.07% vs VGIT's -16.05%.

On 10-year performance, MGV leads with 13.15% vs 1.20% for VGIT. On fees, VGIT is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VGIT has been the lower-risk option at 1.15%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, MGV has performed better with a 13.15% return vs 1.20%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VGIT is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.05% for MGV.

VGIT has the higher dividend yield at 3.86%, compared with 1.85% for MGV.

MGV is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while VGIT is Government Bonds. MGV tracks CRSP US Mega Cap Value Index, while VGIT tracks Bloomberg U.S. Treasury 3-10 Year Index. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for MGV and 0.03% for VGIT.

MGV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.76 vs 0.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MGV and VGIT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer