VGIT vs. SCHR
Compare and contrast key facts about Vanguard Intermediate-Term Treasury ETF (VGIT) and Schwab Intermediate-Term U.S. Treasury ETF (SCHR).
VGIT and SCHR are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. VGIT is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the Barclays U.S. 3-10 Year Government Float Adjusted Index. It was launched on Nov 19, 2009. SCHR is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg US Treasury (3-10 Y). It was launched on Aug 5, 2010. Both VGIT and SCHR are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: VGIT or SCHR.
Key characteristics
| VGIT | SCHR | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | -2.44% | -2.45% |
| 1Y Return | -1.34% | -1.36% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | -3.24% | -3.26% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | -0.05% | -0.05% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 0.97% | 0.98% |
| Sharpe Ratio | -0.17 | -0.17 |
| Daily Std Dev | 5.94% | 5.88% |
| Max Drawdown | -16.05% | -16.11% |
| Current Drawdown | -12.09% | -12.12% |
Correlation
The correlation between VGIT and SCHR is 0.96, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
VGIT vs. SCHR - Performance Comparison
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with VGIT having a -2.44% return and SCHR slightly lower at -2.45%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with VGIT having a 0.97% annualized return and SCHR not far ahead at 0.98%. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
VGIT vs. SCHR - Expense Ratio Comparison
VGIT has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than SCHR's 0.05% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
VGIT vs. SCHR - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Intermediate-Term Treasury ETF (VGIT) and Schwab Intermediate-Term U.S. Treasury ETF (SCHR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
VGIT vs. SCHR - Dividend Comparison
VGIT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.05%, less than SCHR's 3.41% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VGIT Vanguard Intermediate-Term Treasury ETF | 3.05% | 2.73% | 1.74% | 1.69% | 2.23% | 2.24% | 2.05% | 1.67% | 1.69% | 1.69% | 1.54% | 1.63% |
SCHR Schwab Intermediate-Term U.S. Treasury ETF | 3.41% | 3.16% | 2.02% | 1.00% | 1.62% | 2.31% | 2.11% | 1.65% | 1.45% | 1.56% | 1.44% | 1.07% |
Drawdowns
VGIT vs. SCHR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VGIT drawdown since its inception was -16.05%, roughly equal to the maximum SCHR drawdown of -16.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VGIT and SCHR. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
VGIT vs. SCHR - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard Intermediate-Term Treasury ETF (VGIT) and Schwab Intermediate-Term U.S. Treasury ETF (SCHR) have volatilities of 1.63% and 1.61%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.